Average single manager slope

I’m working at a large ($3b+) single manager set up with multiple PMs. I have a carve and also feed ideas into my PM’s book. My slope is about 2% on my ideas in my PM’s book and 4% in my carve. I feel very underpaid. Any feedback on whether or not I’m being unreasonable with thinking I should be at A 3%+ slope on ideas in my PM’s book and 6%+ in my carve?

8 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, your concerns about compensation and slope seem valid, especially given the benchmarks discussed in similar setups. Here's a breakdown:

  1. Slope on Ideas in PM's Book (2%):

    • A 3%+ slope for ideas in your PM's book is not unreasonable. Many analysts or junior PMs feeding into a larger PM's book often aim for higher slopes, especially if their ideas are consistently contributing to performance. If your ideas are driving significant returns, you should consider negotiating for a higher slope.
  2. Slope in Your Carve (4%):

    • A 6%+ slope in your carve is also a reasonable expectation, particularly if you are managing risk effectively and generating strong returns. Carves typically allow for more direct attribution of performance, so a higher slope aligns with industry norms for those delivering results.
  3. Negotiation Considerations:

    • If you feel underpaid, it might be worth gathering data on comparable roles and performance metrics within your firm or across the industry. Highlighting your contributions and the value you bring to the team can strengthen your case for a higher slope.

Ultimately, your expectations align with what others in similar roles might aim for, but the feasibility of achieving these slopes depends on your firm's structure, culture, and compensation philosophy.

Sources: Crazy to take MM offer if lead analyst in ER?, Reflections from year 4 as an equity analyst, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/hedge-fund/the-hedge-fund-experience-good-bad-ugly?customgpt=1, Reflections from year 4 as an equity analyst, Updated 2022 S&T Compensation

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Depends on how much factor/beta risk you can take. If you can own $200m of NVDA and get % of PNL that’s diff than if you need to hedge industry and factor 

 
Most Helpful

Wouldnt compare the slope for a concentrated long biased book to a pod esp if its pajd on pnl and not alpha


Are you charged research expenses and is borrow / rebate included?


A $1bn GMV pod w/ 4% vol and a 1.25 sharpe is looking for $50m PnL * 20% = $10m bonus minus expenses, PM takes half, minus expenses, $5m to go around 2-4 analysts + netting risk 

if u make 800-1.3m in a decent year and don’t have to worry about blowing out every week, it’s probably marketish for an ok $3bn traditional fund 


The dirty secret is alot of $3bn traditional LS funds have some legacy seed deal taking a big chunk of the GP profit and paying discounted fees, or a giant long only book w/ a non-2-and-20 fee structure and a small L/S book with a large of non-fee founder-money it 


If none of this applies to you then disregard, but grass is always greener 




 

 

agree with @Anchor . in my experience the ballpark comp goalposts are 5-10% of P&L at a multi manager and 2-3.5% of P&L at a SM that is directionally net long with looser risk limits, with the upper end of both of those ranges being quite rare. don’t have a good perspective on what % of your carve you should get, but my fund (similar size / model) historically has been ~2% of P&L. as far as % of P&L in your PM’s book, recruiters tell me 2.5-3.5% would be more “market,” but at a certain point most funds will cap you out at marginally more than the bid you’ll get elsewhere

 

At repellat aliquid et ullam ipsa commodi sit eius. Autem veritatis laudantium sit vel. Ipsam dolorum eaque consequuntur aut.

Dicta maxime et voluptatem fuga magni. Eos rerum voluptatum numquam ut quod. Et praesentium qui eaque ducimus sunt error velit.

Facilis tempore aut modi esse vel. Vel aspernatur assumenda sequi laboriosam vel. Tempora ipsa consequuntur veniam quo esse qui eum.

Et qui esse ullam rerum porro omnis. Quidem explicabo fugiat repudiandae. Occaecati cupiditate officia hic et. Fuga aut deleniti nesciunt exercitationem id quasi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (233) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”