I’m working at a large ($3b+) single manager set up with multiple PMs. I have a carve and also feed ideas into my PM’s book. My slope is about 2% on my ideas in my PM’s book and 4% in my carve. I feel very underpaid. Any feedback on whether or not I’m being unreasonable with thinking I should be at A 3%+ slope on ideas in my PM’s book and 6%+ in my carve?
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +114 | Ken Griffin | 65 | 12h |
| +13 | How to break into Biotech/therapeutics HFs | 4 | 5d |
| +9 | P72 Academy -TLDR Worth it? | 4 | 19h |
| +9 | Landing HF Summer Analyst Interviews | 2 | 2d |
| +4 | Kinetic Partners? | 1 | 4d |
| +3 | del | 3 | 2h |
| Minimum GPA for Hedgefund Roles? | 2 | 3d |
Career Resources
Based on the most helpful WSO content, your concerns about compensation and slope seem valid, especially given the benchmarks discussed in similar setups. Here's a breakdown:
Slope on Ideas in PM's Book (2%):
Slope in Your Carve (4%):
Negotiation Considerations:
Ultimately, your expectations align with what others in similar roles might aim for, but the feasibility of achieving these slopes depends on your firm's structure, culture, and compensation philosophy.
Sources: Crazy to take MM offer if lead analyst in ER?, Reflections from year 4 as an equity analyst, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/hedge-fund/the-hedge-fund-experience-good-bad-ugly?customgpt=1, Reflections from year 4 as an equity analyst, Updated 2022 S&T Compensation
The % on your carve would definitely be low at a multimanager. You don't specify whether you're getting a discretionary bonus or such, which would obviously matter.
Depends on how much factor/beta risk you can take. If you can own $200m of NVDA and get % of PNL that’s diff than if you need to hedge industry and factor
Congrats
Wouldnt compare the slope for a concentrated long biased book to a pod esp if its pajd on pnl and not alpha
Are you charged research expenses and is borrow / rebate included?
A $1bn GMV pod w/ 4% vol and a 1.25 sharpe is looking for $50m PnL * 20% = $10m bonus minus expenses, PM takes half, minus expenses, $5m to go around 2-4 analysts + netting risk
if u make 800-1.3m in a decent year and don’t have to worry about blowing out every week, it’s probably marketish for an ok $3bn traditional fund
The dirty secret is alot of $3bn traditional LS funds have some legacy seed deal taking a big chunk of the GP profit and paying discounted fees, or a giant long only book w/ a non-2-and-20 fee structure and a small L/S book with a large of non-fee founder-money it
If none of this applies to you then disregard, but grass is always greener
Porro ea repellendus porro sunt explicabo. Autem est impedit libero fugiat architecto voluptate perspiciatis qui. Laborum iure aliquid molestiae libero occaecati aut sunt.
Fugit ut autem vel voluptatum occaecati odio. Est commodi reiciendis iusto in nulla ut. Ab nulla facilis velit voluptas eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...