What the heck is wrong with this place? They hire and fire heads of their business units like clockwork every couple of years. Have run through multiple heads of equities, macro, quant in the last 5 years. This is despite promoting the “BAMily” super friendly, supposedly unique culture. Also posting some of the worst returns within the peer group. Who has more color? Is senior management that incompetent?
| Best Public Markets Gig? ER, MM HF, SM HF, or LO AM? | 13 | 2d | ||
| +44 | How to start a family office (HF rainmaker) | 17 | 1d | |
| +34 | Law to Quant Pivot? | 10 | 2d | |
| +23 | Starting Personal Account | 12 | 8h | |
| +22 | Looking for a Fund Manager to partner with to start a new fund. | 17 | 3s | |
| +21 | People who work at hedge funds, what made you interested initially? | 13 | 1d | |
| +20 | How to destress at Pod HF? | 8 | 18h | |
| +19 | Hedge Fund WLB | 6 | 1d | |
| +19 | HF Final Round Interview | 4 | 4d | |
| +17 | Most appealing public credit seats out of RX? | 1 | 5d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
following.
Ha great question. Wonder who will replace JR (think Dmitry overseeing equities atm?)
Yeah not quite sure what their problem is, but I’ve heard some pretty insane guarantee #s for PMs there (L/S).
they seem to give everyone high starting numbers. Giving out ugrads 300-400k offers too. Why is everyone leaving then.
If I were an allocator invested in them this would be a huge red flag. Seems there's some kind of one-sided dick measuring contest between Dmitry and Ken Griffin..
Is this for L/S or quant?
Duh? When the company is paying top dollar, they expect to get something in return. Some people are pushed out cause they aren't meeting expectations, and some people quit cause they're burned out from the pressure.
Think they just hired Peter Goodwin from P72
Anyone have details on this guy? Can only imagine the guarantee he got
what guarantee numbers have you heard?
bump. also any insight into Corbets relative to the rest of BAM? looks like a lot of recent hires there
Buddy of mine is PM there he’s very sharp. It has potential
I feel like the firms that make a big deal about how great their culture are and pay for Bloomberg/BI articles, Glassdoor reviews, etc. are often pretty toxic places. I have seen many cases of this. Maybe the management knows it and has hired HR to repair their reputation, so it happens after the fact.
This is just true. Any firm that rambles nonstop about how great their culture is...never has great culture. Places with good culture don't need to yammer on about their culture all the time, if at all.
Could it be that it's just damn hard to win in this business? Amused at the comments taking cheap shots... it's just hard and extremely competitive. You find and nurture a great PM, KG and Izzy come and start throwing tens of millions at him to jump ship. XP same deal with subpar returns, it's just extraordinary the returns Citadel is posting. Literally out of the ordinary.
From what HHs have said they try to avoid overlapping in strategies and products. While at the same time they have a very laid back culture as you mentioned. This results in hiring multiple business heads, which to your point makes no sense, certain businesses even when are looking to expand have 2 business heads which again minimal sense. That said seems this stuff is all more at high level. MLP would say is other way minimal business heads, tons of pods overlapping pods. MLP fires entire pods and start new ones way faster.
Citadel is whole other culture as we all know and they do a lot of more unique. To your other point this is prolly where Baly gets into trouble trying to duplicate Ken’s aggressive growth in certain businesses, be it quant equities, commodities, or RV fixed income.
What happened in 2023 is that BAM got caught being overweight equity long/short in not a great year for that strategy AND their ELS biz underperformed the rest. They are going to try to catch up in the other spaces (commodities, quant in particular) but it ain't easy. In equity long short they will throw money at people to get better teams in the door, but again so is everyone else, so not sure how they gain ground.
Problem is it takes at least 1 year to get a team in the door with non-competes, and then it takes at year to fully ramp up. So they’re at least 2 years behind, and that’s not factoring in how long they’ve already been behind in this space without realizing it. The real challenge is trying to figure out which asset class/strategy will be hot in 3 years from now and start developing that business now.
Isn’t their equity L/S business supposed to be their flagship? You don’t hear about Citadel’s L/S product having a terrible year (or MLPs or P72s for that matter). Bottom line is that at all the major platforms most of the risk is deployed in L/S so to blame a 10% underperformance versus peers seems a little bit of a cop out.
On the point of building out new businesses - also a little misleading. From what I understand they tried to build a quant business around 5-6 years ago and fired everyone. They have had at least 2-3 macro heads that they’ve fired in the same time period (Colin Lancaster and Tim Wilkinson) and they also had tried to build a commodity business years ago and fired everyone.
They are in the process of building a commodity business right now. Dmitry’s strategy is to go to top schools and beg quant majors with 400k starting offers, instead of taking people from industry. He personally goes to target schools.
Totally fair, but again we trying to explain why it's not exactly the worst place on earth to work. Remember Citadel is basically closed to new investors, MLP same. So maybe their peer group has changed overtime and many of the issues discussed exist at other places like some larger multi-strat or SM types. Yup they folded both quant and commodities in the least 5-10 years and now trying to build out both strategies and early results so far looks better. Quant and Commodities did well in 2023 as mentioned ELS was what sunk them. Further to your point about ELS being their flagship, well they sort of fired all the other divisions and missed the initial macro/quant move in 2018+.
Idk - I think that ballyasny has run into the problem of under investing in the business
Why don’t they have a quant platform like the other guys - because they never put the dollars upfront int tech and infrastructure
I think they have missed out on scaling in the non equity l/s strategies - like credit / macro / quant / commods
I don’t understand why multistrats are bloated short term LS equity vehicles. I understand there is a familiarity bias, but the entire purpose is to combine as many uncorrelated return streams with positive expected value. Millennium seems to be the most agnostic (as long as one is RV focused).
BAM has grown wildly fast and now is hyper focused on PMs that can scale huge rather than PMs that are truly additive.
That’s what happens in the no man’s land of not paying up as much as Citadel and MLP but being huge enough that you can’t hire the PMs who are more capacity constrained at a few hundred million dollar books and have them make a meaningful difference.
Placeat quo qui eos rem mollitia aut libero tempore. Iste omnis quas voluptate aut sed voluptates recusandae. Natus sunt ipsam saepe accusantium voluptatibus sapiente nam. Modi labore adipisci qui facere ad et eum voluptatem.
Omnis consectetur ipsa aut. Unde ullam ipsa sapiente distinctio ad aspernatur excepturi. Et magnam autem placeat cum aut. Accusamus beatae eius rerum provident enim.
Rerum eum explicabo vel praesentium ducimus reprehenderit. Ut ut dolorum corporis.
Ea nostrum est cumque explicabo nesciunt fugiat quia. Eos perferendis accusantium possimus cumque natus quaerat sapiente. Vel non reiciendis dolor aut nemo tempora accusantium aut. Deserunt praesentium esse beatae ducimus dignissimos. Dolores libero consectetur doloremque aperiam et rem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Eos sunt atque totam. Facere ullam molestiae soluta veniam qui fuga. Ipsam quae quasi magni est quaerat esse. Iure voluptatem aspernatur ut impedit sit molestiae explicabo. Ipsum tenetur ipsam repellat sint eveniet error.
Cupiditate atque est eum necessitatibus at voluptatem. Officia praesentium totam qui magni voluptatem et. Vitae provident blanditiis facilis. Vero nihil sapiente esse occaecati et.