Drivers of Stock Price vs. Valuation Multiples

It seems for some stocks investors are very focused on EPS, while for others it can be anything from EBITDA, to sales, to margins, FCF, or even # of active users. When looking at a new company, what's your framework for thinking about the main driver of a stock price?

Also how do you gauge when to use P/E, vs EV/EBITDA, EV/FCF, etc? Suppose a company grows top-line at 5-10% per year, and generates positive earnings and cash flow. When would you use P/E vs. EV/EBITDA? Would EV/EBITDA still be fair if the company didn't have debt?

From my understanding people tend to use P/E when there's earnings, EBITDA when there's no earnings, and sales when there's strong top-line growth but negative EBITDA, but I was just curious to see if anyone had any other views on this.

3 Comments
 
Best Response

I think it's a combination, and it's also industry specific. A lot of industrial companies use P/E for valuation. Telecom uses FCF because these are low/negative growing companies that mainly trade off a yield basis. Dividend payout ratios are very important. Tower companies / Reits trade off of AFFO (adj funds from operations or FCF exc. growth capex and working capital) and then EBITDA. Like you mentioned, high growing companies use revenue because it's assumed FCF is negative (grow capex and working cap) and EBITDA isn't the best measure b/c you're rapidly expanding with high opex / working cap. In general, I think you can't go wrong with EBITDA in any industry and then P/E / FCF as appropriate.

 

On a side note, what's driving that growth is prob. most important. When a company beats P/E, a hedge fund may literally walk every line item to see where the company beat expectations. Most funds model down to EBIT as interested is assumed the same and no one cares if they beat / miss BC of taxes. They also can build sophisticated builds that incorporate macro environment / minor company comments such as 5% of EBIT beat was attributed to volume or price.

 

Similique soluta doloremque consectetur. Autem sed totam repellat qui magnam et. Qui et quis ab non minus pariatur quia.

Eum nihil rerum omnis distinctio maiores laboriosam. Recusandae et est mollitia officia expedita. Voluptatem est quis quod nostrum unde.

Natus alias veritatis et aut. Velit laudantium facere consequatur laboriosam distinctio possimus est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”