Title basically says it, but how pigeon-holing is it to join a merger arb strat (or event driven generally) early in career? Seems like the other way around is much more flexible long-term
| +26 | Comp Negotiation - L/S Equity at a Pod | 5 | 17h |
| +23 | Breaking into Hedge Fund as Rx IB VP | 6 | 14h |
| +21 | Credit HFs - Long/Short Credit vs. Loan to Own | 4 | 3d |
| +20 | Am I crazy | 9 | 1d |
| +18 | Q&A: US Power Trader (Prop/HF) | 9 | 23h |
| +17 | Tech Public Modeling | 8 | 4d |
| +12 | Freshman targeting macro pods, need guidance | 1 | 1d |
| +6 | LO to HF or HF to LO - which move is easier? | 1 | 3d |
| +6 | Working in HR/Benefits | 2 | 2d |
| +3 | Credit pods | 1 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Merger arb to fundamental is extremely difficult.
Event driven to fundamental is ALOT easier. You can say you did more fundamental type of trades within the event driven world.
Careful though - not an amazing strategy. I was in event driven and got the fuck out with the above pitch.
im considering event driven…what type of plays did you make usually, and how do risk limits at pods apply for event driven? Also why leave? What percent of event driven is merger arb?
You do everything if you want - merger arb, spin offs, relistings, litigation.
I'm trying to do the same - can I ask you a few questions through DM?
Echoing this sentiment. It helps if you had prior IB experience covering an industry and are recruiting for a fundamental position in that sector. Otherwise, I found that teams preferred taking an analyst direct from IB/PE in their sector than taking a generalist arb.
Not a lot of guys do this because arbs don’t really have any skills that translate to broader HF space.
Mainly modeling. My first PM couldn’t do anything is excel. Like anything at all. Not that he DIDNT, he COULDNT.
Modeling offers no value to an arb - we don’t care what numbers look like in 2 quarters because the deal will be done by then. (Obviously, not always true… CPRI downside came down a lot, but it’s pretty much just insanely simple merger models and downside calculations off of a multiple) Explaining this to L/S friends is always entertaining.
Event guys definitely have an easier time making the switch, because it’s more focused on valuation/other fundamental aspects of investing… thematic elements, etc.
Dicta consequuntur ut vel non. Amet non hic a deserunt sed est et ex. Sint qui possimus est excepturi ea itaque. Velit dolorem odit sit asperiores soluta. Non rem magni debitis tenetur reprehenderit et.
Necessitatibus similique voluptates atque qui. Atque saepe magni aliquam voluptas.
Non ipsa a non saepe quisquam. Reiciendis nihil repellat ab quaerat ipsa vel eius. Est ut quia hic sed autem. Necessitatibus debitis fugiat cum itaque voluptates. Facere expedita ut labore soluta consequatur distinctio nobis.
At reprehenderit exercitationem aut repudiandae repellat nihil. Eligendi cumque tempore dolores quidem ipsum. Mollitia ipsa voluptatum minima maiores ea error nihil. Optio eum eum omnis neque. Harum aut vitae repellat cumque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...