How do pods come up with quarterly estimates?

When building models, how do pod analyst comes up with expected revenue or margin beats/misses?  

In software, for example, how does one take a view on whether Microsoft Azure was going to be 28% growth (vs 25-26% guide) and expects 26-27%? Or Salesforce margins would be 27.6% vs. Street at 25.8% and buyside expects at 26%?

like, one could say “AI should contribute more” or “salesforce margins can still be another 10pts higher” but that’s a qualitative opinion not based on anything specific for the quarter.  
 

Or one can do spreadsheet math and say the expected net new growth or incremental margins on a 2 year stack or three year stack are hard or easy comps. But that’s the baseline.  And I would still be plugging a number slight above or below based on an opinion.

And yipit just changes the expects, but they are also wrong 50% of the time, and its just a better “street estimate.”

any real life examples to explain would be tremendous.  Thank you! 

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

My intuition is that on companies like MSFT and AMZN, it is very hard to actually nail that with a ton of confidence, and you aren't necessarily looking for the $3.50 in EPS vs. the $3.48 factset consensus and $3.52 buyside whisper, and more about, will azure growth be +27% instead of +22%, and is my delta significant? I believe they are leveraging everything you described (seasonality, detailed revenue + cost models, YoY stacks, and primarily alt data). Throw in commentary intra-quarter on your channel checks and you get closer - more importantly its about interpreting the expectations game on these huge stocks, and how these data points feed the bigger story and how you can catch the inflection points on these names. No conviction or delta, then you stay perfectly hedged, or don't compete. Alternatively, you could find an aspect that is going underappreciated, but that seems more common for longer duration bets and not the MM model. Yipit isn't the only data provider, and I'm sure there is someone who had to backtest the significance of an alt data provider that measures AWS instance startups vs. the internally built 3-statement model's AWS revenue build. 

On less broad and widely followed mega mega caps, I think you start to find more "edgy" opportunities to apply those tools we discussed (leading indicators for the sector, how is the stock trading intra-quarter on those indicators and vs. peers, what does that say about the "story" and expectations, and then what are the battleground numbers in the print, and can you do enough due diligence intra-quarter on the key drivers of your model for those numbers + where is the risk / reward? 

This is just my intuition here, could be completely wrong though. I work at an RIA. 

 

Nam deserunt rerum eligendi similique et autem cum. Quasi illum odio laborum iste ut illo. Nam excepturi placeat assumenda eaque. Tempora ut odio eos ab. Accusamus aut impedit reiciendis. Ut vero et omnis veniam autem et quis. Occaecati enim vel error totam assumenda sit.

Aperiam nesciunt eligendi sint est voluptates amet non. Tempora doloribus et ipsam quisquam et repellat ab qui. Occaecati voluptatibus et atque qui ut non dolores. Necessitatibus inventore recusandae quo officiis porro quia et. Est quidem sunt nesciunt commodi architecto. Magni aut quia quibusdam sed a omnis laborum.

Consequuntur ducimus molestias esse cupiditate odio ea. Consectetur et rerum perspiciatis alias modi. Qui soluta maiores officia facilis corrupti.

 

Dolorum incidunt cumque tempore reiciendis consequatur. Repellat ipsa quos soluta autem harum ducimus. Sed repellendus a aut voluptatem dolor beatae.

Tempora sint modi aut aspernatur ex temporibus. Sunt facere et amet esse accusantium. Dicta rem aspernatur placeat.

Molestias tempore distinctio sed sit earum. Quam reiciendis sit ut blanditiis. Deleniti et quo ut molestias eum laudantium fugiat. Odio recusandae quo molestiae id. Suscipit quis eius cumque sit quia expedita nihil iusto. Et est consequatur sed molestiae et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Millennium Partners 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”