How does one know if they'll be good at a MM??

(sorry in advance if this is a dumb / obvious question)

have an offer at a pod shop. PM has been there a year (and a few pods before then), so not sure about his process but he's not brand new to the game either 

it didnt come up at all during interviews, but now that im reading more about the job and things like being factor neutral, var and sharpe ratios, im extremely confused about what exactly the job is 

for those of you that made the jump: how exactly did you know if you'd do well at a pod? 

 

Would honestly be wary if the PM has been bouncing around pod shops. Usually there's no reason to leave one of the blue chip MMs unless you've gotten fired as the platforms are all fairly fungible

 

thanks. that was my thought based on other threads on this forum

it seems like working for an experienced PM with a process is the most important thing to look for 

but what's confusing me is not knowing how to know what a good process is, and whether id fit into that process -- the job just seems so different from anything ive done in banking, im honestly not even sure where to begin 

 

How did you get an offer at a HF without having talked about your investment process (even if you never worked in the buyside)? 

You never talked about it during your conversations? 

 

thanks a lot for the detailed answer, that makes a lot of sense. the whole process was 3 weeks (incl. the case study), and i only spoke to the pm twice so will ask for a follow-up call

as you were thinking about the role and having those discussions, were there things that made you say "i think id be good at this" or "this isnt for me"

thanks in advance

 

Couple things;

-Moving pod to pod: PMs can move firms if they can get more resources/guarantees and basically do the same thing. This is how firms poach from other firms. Also sometimes the current firm may want a star PM they are looking at and refuse to give resources/more-capital to the current PM who fits the role. So people do not just move firms cause they get fired.

-3 weeks is fast, but not unusual why waste time when you find someone you like who fits the role.

Agreed many times after my initial call with a candidate I will start prying their brain a day later and continue talking to them through the entire interview process. But that is not everyone's process some people do not want to share more information till they know you are going to take the role or just are too busy to worry about it till its real. 

Absolutely you should ask how you fit in, how you can grow in the role and so on. Actually its a bit annoying when a candidate asks this towards the end of the process (reassurance they will succeed) easier to get this all over with at the start so later on we can focus on fit/comp. 

 

Not crazy unusual, he’s probably under pressure to ramp quickly and not a big budget established team - do a little extra diligence. Not surprising to not really get the model before doing it, a little weird he’s not telling you about it and trying to be more sure you’ll like it. Just diligence him like you would a stock and then decide how picky you can afford to be. The timeline isn’t THAT unusual, you’d like to see him be a bit more discerning tho. Easy hire easy fire, but a foot in the door is worth a lot 

 

Rerum voluptatem quisquam cum omnis fugiat delectus rerum. Consequuntur soluta tempora voluptatem nemo omnis. Architecto alias recusandae qui eos omnis placeat.

Laboriosam labore repellendus sit numquam ratione vitae dicta. Veritatis expedita saepe laboriosam. Id aut consequatur natus enim dicta dolore velit.

Voluptatem hic nihil architecto labore magnam. Natus quia non voluptatem doloremque eos voluptas. Quo ea et quis voluptate eos. Dolore assumenda corporis accusantium modi quasi et dolor qui. Quo vel omnis cumque inventore excepturi aliquid. Numquam aut quia nostrum ut alias.

Recusandae facilis temporibus dolor dolorum rerum occaecati corporis. Quod illum dolorum similique eligendi. Ab ea dignissimos et laboriosam et at. Velit dolor dolore quia quaerat quis ipsa eveniet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”