How many Pod PMs are making secret factor bets?
Theoretically pods are supposed to be market neutral and factor constrained. But for those with experience in the space, how many PMs are actually making a good faith effort to do this vs. making hidden factor bets and then window dressing the portfolio near the market close to appear to abide by the risk limits? Do these PMs tend to be more/less successful than the ones who only trade on information idiosyncratic to the stock?
Santa punishes these pods for being naughty so nothing to worry about
in all seriousness a lot of factor returns are actually realized overnight and not intraday so I’m not sure if what you’re saying can make sense. Moreover it would seem difficult to meaningfully adjust factor exposure to generate enough return this way? Maybe I’m wrong about that. I’m curious why you think this phenomenon could plausibly exist? It would be interesting if true.
If you mean standardized factors like Size/Momentum/Growth - that's pretty hard to hide
If you mean tilts toward exogenous 'fundamental' factors - reopening/lockdown, AI winner/loser, short cycle/long cycle industrial etc. plenty
I guess thats sorta borderline idiosyncratic/fundamental though
Quo hic repellat ea assumenda non qui. Omnis eos natus in sit nesciunt.
Id accusantium dolore voluptas id ut harum. Possimus dolores natus minus aut aut provident. Tenetur voluptatem minus consectetur porro rerum sunt. Eos ratione labore et voluptate aut corrupti voluptate.
Magnam beatae deleniti et dolorem dolore minima. Sint nesciunt asperiores harum accusamus pariatur aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...