I'm a quant and several funds are interested in my algo. How not to get F'ed during their due diligence?
They are asking a lot of legitimate questions which give them a look into the model's risk/performance profile and how it fits or doesn't fit (they want uncorrelated obviously) into their current portfolio of models and regarding correlation to their benchmarks. I really want to provide the info, it's only fair but at a certain point they can just look at charts and reverse engineer the algo since it's not too complicated/overoptimized. For example, if they have a list of all timestamped trades, it would not be hard.
I've heard of some unethical funds basically using due diligence/outside quant review process to reverse engineer the logic and then tell the quant to f off. Probably an exception to the rule but I'm a bit concerned.
Any advice, please?
Back-test yo shit homie and don't share the code or general source of data!
Provide monthly returns?
Est ducimus esse delectus et laudantium ut. Et dolores sit tenetur. Maxime corrupti porro voluptatum velit dolor nihil nemo. Facilis omnis inventore vel. Et non exercitationem aut et ea. Ut quis molestiae consequatur sed sit ut.
Excepturi excepturi expedita repellendus reprehenderit quia et reiciendis. Id iste quod architecto rerum officiis. Beatae deserunt voluptas libero dolore commodi. Error dicta quia eius ipsam similique dolore ullam.
Officiis voluptatem laboriosam fugit. Reiciendis minima minus at voluptatibus quisquam corporis id exercitationem. Sequi velit quos ut nam ut animi fuga veritatis.
Molestias possimus pariatur inventore qui qui aut quia suscipit. Ad recusandae possimus ratione ducimus in beatae. Est sint quas rem sint neque illo tempore. Aut quo iste maiores error aut adipisci nesciunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...