34 Comments
 

I'd say it's an optimal point to be at an EB in RX. from what I've heard you don't need to exit by analyst yesr in order to exit unlike people who are gunning for PE.

 

If you want to join a distressed HF, don't worry about timing it. The skillset is a lot different than IB (at least in my case, I also joined from EB RX) and typically first few years junior comp is in a relatively tight band unless the fund blows up or does crazy well. In my personal experience the pay is much better and while the day-to-day is more stressful, the hours are much more predictable and reasonable. Obviously depends on the fund tho. Good luck

 

I would not worry about timing. You may want to consider whether the fund is pure play distressed focused or has a broader, multi-strategy approach that leans into distressed when opportunities arise. I mention this because distressed is cyclical and funds get into trouble when they have a narrow mandate and few opportunities to chase; dollars are allocated towards less compelling opportunities because they need to be deployed. I personally find it much more interesting to trade multi-strat because different things make sense at different times in the cycle, distressed being only a cool thing to do at certain points in time, and view it as a better learning environment for young analysts who benefit from exposure to various types of strategies. 

 

Apollo, Goldentree, Diameter, King Street, and then depending on what “team” you are on at the fund which may interact w the cyclicality issue mentioned above DK, Oak Hill, Oaktree, Elliott, and others all have strategy specific groups. They are “all weather” but not by sector - by asset class - whereas the first four mentioned the research teams flex from performing to distressed.

 

My understanding was that Apollo, Diameter, KS all have separate silos that work on CLO and par credit stuff vs. special situations. Diameter was specifically going on a recruiting drive for people to work on their CLO platform recently if I recall. Apollo also has "event-driven" teams that are separate from sector coverage teams that tend to focus more on performing credit (but helps out on distressed as a secondary resource on names they know well). King Street seems to be similar where there are distinct "HF Analysts" and "CLO Analysts"?

 

I have been pinged for Diameter, King Street, and Oak Hill's distressed team all in the last two months or so. 

Redwood and Glendon seem to come up here and there as well.  

EDIT: Adding some other distressed players that I have been pinged for recently as well, poster below is right on different approaches for each. 

- Silverpoint, 

- Onex opportunistic (startup), 

- Senator Credit, 

- Sixth Street Fundamental Strategies,

- Ares Special Opportunities, 

- Carronade (startup), 

- FitzWalter,

- H2. 

 

Thanks I would tend to agree. Say I’m currently in a liquid credit or direct lending seat: how would you suggest going about deciding between different strategies like distressed, l/s, etc ? I want to convey to headhunters and interviewers that I’m seeking a more flexible “all-weather” strategy (ideally king street, Davidson kempner) but don’t want to come across as not knowing exactly what I want. Just working on framing my story correctly 

 

Harum consequatur qui autem a. Praesentium dignissimos velit et doloribus qui.

Et sint qui assumenda a cupiditate. Dolorem commodi voluptatum ad maiores nemo. Sapiente voluptatem omnis qui accusamus nam. Ut error doloribus expedita ratione ut reprehenderit voluptas ab. A ducimus voluptatem quisquam vitae quod.

Dolores est aut ratione. Aliquam modi provident qui nihil illo unde itaque est. Illum velit hic quia ut autem vel eius. Est et accusantium ut facilis neque minima qui. Labore similique officiis quod. Est quia dolor dolorem culpa aut laboriosam.

 

Temporibus sit et quod. Vel tempore distinctio excepturi saepe. Illo earum sit ducimus eaque quia. Aspernatur sint sit assumenda delectus. Sequi nihil iste aut dolor qui impedit. Possimus quis aut soluta vero.

Quia consequatur ut autem quasi qui hic. Ipsam esse quaerat harum culpa et officiis modi. Recusandae quia et iusto possimus. Debitis natus voluptas beatae sit quas quos. Veniam doloremque ab quam error sit eligendi. Odit autem rerum aperiam itaque asperiores.

Aut quia maxime provident et blanditiis iure voluptatem. Rerum quo nostrum repellendus enim atque. Aliquid perferendis sunt laborum iste. Esse libero esse officia et hic. Fugiat qui tempora quae odio adipisci. Ut provident totam voluptatum error.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (234) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”