Anyone have thoughts on what might be the better opportunity? MBB would be in NYC. Interested broadly in a career in finance but have heard interesting things about Bwater culture and non-compete. Hate to ask, but which opportunity would you say is more 'prestigious'?
| +51 | Do you regret going into public markets investing? | 28 | 7s | |
| +46 | Alta Fox - How did Connor Haley do it? | 24 | 1d | |
| +36 | RIP Jim Simons | 28 | 3s | |
| +23 | Advice ahead of a pair trade presentation - HF interview | 7 | 3h | |
| +23 | Is Quasi-MNPI The Ultimate Alpha Generator For Public Equities? | 8 | 21h | |
| +22 | Point 72 let go of seven long-short managers !! | 26 | 5h | |
| +18 | UPenn SEAS vs Cornell Engineering | 8 | 4d | |
| +17 | SM Career Trajectory | 5 | 5d | |
| +16 | PMs: move across platforms, latest terms | 15 | 5d | |
| +13 | Why are so many people here interested in Biotech? | 14 | 11s |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Congrats on Baird.
The prestige difference between Bwater and MBB doesn’t really matter here since they are such different career paths.
I promise you no one will ever think you’re “un-prestigious” for working at McKinsey or Bwater.
What you really need to ask is do you want to be at a macro HF or doing consulting. Those are such incredibly different paths that’s it’s really hard to even compare. MBB would provide you broader optionality (including PE) but if you want to do macro HF Bwater is one of the best names there is.
If I were you I’d start researching macro HF (since it’s more niche and therefore easier to diligence) and see if you’d like to make a career in that space and if not then start looking into MBB
Bridgewater -- MBB will always be available to you (cant say the same about Bridgewater)
Other way around
congrats on mbb
If I were you, I would be cautious about bridgewater. No job security and very possible you don’t do well enough in their macro classes to be let in as an investment associate. Also, as a junior, you’ll be working in such niche macro research areas without understanding of the overall strategy you’re kinda fucked if you try to exit or get fired
I’d take MBB - much more optionality.
I highly doubt you went through Bridgewater process entirely and still hesitate about joining a MBB.
Not OP but at most Ivys people going through MBB and Bwater process simultaneously is pretty common (source: bunch of my friends at my Ivy did and a few got cross offered)
At UG recruiting level Bwater makes its recruitment a more “general are you smart” thing similar to MBB vs a typical HF/finance recruiting process. I remember when they came on campus they told us you don’t really need any finance background for it.
Autem quos omnis id minima aut neque in. Officia asperiores dolores illum unde consequatur voluptatibus. Inventore nobis et incidunt eum est.
Non commodi non assumenda vero nulla dignissimos recusandae. Veniam enim alias consectetur tenetur similique. Animi modi voluptatibus aut molestiae deleniti adipisci qui. Et ex ullam consequatur excepturi quae voluptates qui.
Itaque aut dolore velit laborum maxime. Eius molestiae eveniet molestiae occaecati expedita aut blanditiis. Exercitationem id quia sed est iste.
Animi eius officiis temporibus nemo blanditiis. Nostrum quisquam autem iusto molestiae porro. Aut aut in itaque exercitationem magnam. Et deleniti eius voluptatem est iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...