McAfee Merger Arbitrage

McAfee shares jumped around 20% today (11/5) based on the media reporting a buyout by a private equity consortium. The reports state that the deal is going to be worth $15 billion. Their current debt outstanding is $4 billion. Hence, the offered equity valuation comes out to be $11 billion. 

Given that they have 434 million shares outstanding and their current share price is $25.46, their market cap comes out to be $11 billion as well.

My question is that as far as I know when an acquisition is announced, the stock price trades at a discount to the proposed offered price (to price in the risk of the deal not going through). In this case, the stock price is trading exactly at the level of the offered price ($11 billion offered equity valuation vs $11 billion current market cap).

I was curious what factors have led to such a situation occurring or is their problem in the math I did above?

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Since nobody else has answer: I don’t know anything about this particular deal and I don’t work in merger arb so I can’t give the most elegant of answers. But generally speaking, the price post announcement will be a function of a number of factors, three of which include certainty of close (as you mentioned), time to close, and ultimate purchase price.

Certainly of close— higher the certainty, the smaller the discount. Maybe investors are nearly certain this will close because they know the PE sponsor is sitting on a huge cash pile, dying to invest.

Time to close— simply put, time value of money. The quick the deal closes, the smaller the discount.

Ultimate purchase price— just because it’s reported that the deal will be worth $15 mil doesn’t mean that’s what it ultimately will be. Investors might urge the acquirer to pay more, or they might expect a bidding war.

 

Dolor delectus est eligendi distinctio nihil. Asperiores possimus quaerat animi veniam rerum ratione quod. Consequatur qui et autem veniam dicta atque dolorem. Voluptas non sit consequatur sint quis. Voluptatibus accusantium sunt corrupti sequi sapiente doloremque quidem. Accusamus atque sed tempore rerum provident sunt.

At fugit in veritatis placeat voluptas similique. Nemo odio et quod sit nulla. Fugiat maxime sed dicta enim qui aut. Et itaque veritatis sed esse dolorem qui consectetur. Molestias tenetur illum dolores qui earum laborum nemo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”