Hello all,
Hope you are surviving the summer! Anyone has any insides on these guys? They seem to do a bunch of cool stuff, which I assume is because they have a very flexible mandate. Last data point I got was £3.7Bn AuM, and c.30 people (15 back-office).
Any insides on returns, comps, founders, culture, etc?
Thank you
| Best Public Markets Gig? ER, MM HF, SM HF, or LO AM? | 13 | 2d | ||
| +44 | How to start a family office (HF rainmaker) | 17 | 1d | |
| +34 | Law to Quant Pivot? | 10 | 2d | |
| +23 | Starting Personal Account | 12 | 8h | |
| +22 | Looking for a Fund Manager to partner with to start a new fund. | 17 | 1h | |
| +21 | People who work at hedge funds, what made you interested initially? | 13 | 1d | |
| +20 | How to destress at Pod HF? | 8 | 21h | |
| +19 | Hedge Fund WLB | 6 | 1d | |
| +19 | HF Final Round Interview | 4 | 5d | |
| +17 | Most appealing public credit seats out of RX? | 1 | 5d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Bump
Bump
know someone who interviewed there. I don't know much but they seem like french-heavy old-school generalists, sharp ratio not great, not my cup of tea. The thing about SM they're really dependent on the PM's style. Being generalist could be great for them, less so for you if you wanna exit later.
[Realized I was speaking about another fund, my bad]
Melqart, yes agreed, very French (although founder is Lebanese) style.
I would say tho, they are event-driven, so their performance is not compared to benchmark, hence sharp ratio is less relevant. And they get fees paid on absolute return, not on relative returns
It could be. think it depends on your mandate right, but very few people do not have a benchmark or a vol. target.
I think they recently launched a macro product
Bump - any more insights about culture, comp, performance? What would the usual entry level comp for an analyst be (base and bonus range) for a fund of its size (think its more about 2bn according to public info) and 20 professionals (10 investment team according to website)
Their distressed guys are legit - sharp, understand restructuring dynamics, and seem to get pretty in the weeds on names.
Similique tenetur non culpa corporis voluptatibus. Consequatur hic id ut molestias quam. Nihil est dicta quia dolores. Corporis harum esse et velit tempore tempora. Quia nisi recusandae repellendus qui eos reiciendis.
Sed animi qui ab sunt aut dolores ipsa inventore. Rerum laudantium et facere adipisci blanditiis. Rerum minus explicabo impedit quo quos qui vel. Aliquid tempora corrupti dolorem provident. Temporibus impedit molestias ut nesciunt autem.
Laborum corrupti sunt excepturi ducimus veritatis fuga dolor. Alias maxime quisquam sit sint dignissimos. Voluptas quos officia hic harum numquam et. Esse quo maxime et aspernatur quaerat explicabo. Qui ut voluptatem nihil eum id natus. Maiores quo magnam et quae id cumque. Accusamus aut dolores quis nesciunt quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...