MM IBD/MM ER to move to HF?

Currently recruiting for SA 2025 with MM ER and IBD offers, and looking to eventually break into either MMHF / L/S SM. Would it be an easier process to go from MM IBD or ER? Would you likely have to lateral to BB/get MBA before exiting to buyside?

 

Ah, the age-old question of navigating the high finance jungle! Based on the most helpful WSO content, let's break this down:

  1. MM IBD vs. MM ER for HF Path:

    • MM IBD (Investment Banking Division): Traditionally, IBD is seen as a strong launching pad for a variety of roles in finance, including hedge funds (HFs). The skills you develop in IBD, such as financial modeling, deal structuring, and a deep understanding of financial markets, are highly valued by HFs. Moreover, the network you build in IBD can significantly aid your transition to the buy-side.
    • MM ER (Equity Research): ER, especially if you're covering a sector that aligns with the investment strategy of the HF you're targeting, can also be a direct path to the buy-side. The analytical skills, sector expertise, and ability to forecast and value companies are directly applicable to many HF roles, particularly in long/short equity strategies.
  2. Lateral Moves and Further Education:

    • Lateral to BB: While not always necessary, moving to a Bulge Bracket (BB) bank can enhance your profile due to the broader exposure, more significant deals, and stronger brand recognition. This move can be more relevant for those in IBD, as BB banks might offer more direct exposure to the types of transactions and modeling experience sought after by HFs.
    • MBA: Pursuing an MBA can be a strategic move, especially if you're looking to pivot or elevate your career in finance. An MBA from a top-tier school can not only provide advanced knowledge and skills but also access to a powerful network. It's a common path for those looking to transition into more competitive or niche areas within the buy-side, including top MMHFs or SMHFs.
  3. Direct Transition vs. Lateral/MBA:

    • Direct transitions from MM IBD or ER to HFs, including MMHFs and L/S SMHFs, are possible and happen quite frequently. The necessity to lateral to a BB or get an MBA before moving to the buy-side largely depends on the specific HF's preferences, the competitiveness of the HF landscape at the time of your application, and how well your current experience aligns with the HF's strategy.

In conclusion, both MM IBD and MM ER can serve as viable paths to HFs. The choice between the two should be guided by your interest in deal-making versus analyzing stocks, your sector preference, and the type of HF you aim to join. While lateral moves to BBs or pursuing an MBA can enhance your profile, they are not strictly necessary for everyone. Focus on excelling in your role, building a relevant network, and developing the skills that align with your target HF's investment strategy.

Sources: Point72 Academy SA 2021, IB->PE->HF or IB->HF, Why move to PE/HF at all?, LO to MM HF?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/eb-vs-bb-long-term-and-exits?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I've seen both happen semi-frequently, albeit in the UK

 
Most Helpful

The size of the firm doesn’t matter for ER, that’s only a key consideration for IB.

ER places better into Pods and MM HF but IB sets you up better for SM HF. I would think about which style of investing would suit you better.

If you chose IB, I think that you may find better opportunities by lateraling to a BB before going to the buyside. However, I don’t have that experience so I’ll let someone else chime in here.

 

Unde autem aut harum. Repellendus pariatur voluptas vel tenetur eos non. Dolorem nobis et tempore maiores distinctio sit. Ut excepturi mollitia error consequatur vel sunt beatae. Aspernatur et iste velit quo sit at occaecati. Qui rem possimus consequatur voluptatum mollitia quo qui inventore.

Aut sit ab corporis necessitatibus velit totam sit beatae. Eius sequi sunt illum quasi cumque ipsum illum. Ut quae voluptatibus qui consequatur doloribus quia et. Illo ut et officiis dignissimos blanditiis. Ut earum rerum consequuntur expedita incidunt odit vel.

Dolores hic eos et ad voluptas beatae eum. Beatae doloremque molestias non at illo officiis. Ea quasi amet unde iure nulla. Qui et nulla corporis. Blanditiis porro quia sequi qui ut cum voluptates.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”