MM IBD/MM ER to move to HF?

Currently recruiting for SA 2025 with MM ER and IBD offers, and looking to eventually break into either MMHF / L/S SM. Would it be an easier process to go from MM IBD or ER? Would you likely have to lateral to BB/get MBA before exiting to buyside?

6 Comments
 

Ah, the age-old question of navigating the high finance jungle! Based on the most helpful WSO content, let's break this down:

  1. MM IBD vs. MM ER for HF Path:

    • MM IBD (Investment Banking Division): Traditionally, IBD is seen as a strong launching pad for a variety of roles in finance, including hedge funds (HFs). The skills you develop in IBD, such as financial modeling, deal structuring, and a deep understanding of financial markets, are highly valued by HFs. Moreover, the network you build in IBD can significantly aid your transition to the buy-side.
    • MM ER (Equity Research): ER, especially if you're covering a sector that aligns with the investment strategy of the HF you're targeting, can also be a direct path to the buy-side. The analytical skills, sector expertise, and ability to forecast and value companies are directly applicable to many HF roles, particularly in long/short equity strategies.
  2. Lateral Moves and Further Education:

    • Lateral to BB: While not always necessary, moving to a Bulge Bracket (BB) bank can enhance your profile due to the broader exposure, more significant deals, and stronger brand recognition. This move can be more relevant for those in IBD, as BB banks might offer more direct exposure to the types of transactions and modeling experience sought after by HFs.
    • MBA: Pursuing an MBA can be a strategic move, especially if you're looking to pivot or elevate your career in finance. An MBA from a top-tier school can not only provide advanced knowledge and skills but also access to a powerful network. It's a common path for those looking to transition into more competitive or niche areas within the buy-side, including top MMHFs or SMHFs.
  3. Direct Transition vs. Lateral/MBA:

    • Direct transitions from MM IBD or ER to HFs, including MMHFs and L/S SMHFs, are possible and happen quite frequently. The necessity to lateral to a BB or get an MBA before moving to the buy-side largely depends on the specific HF's preferences, the competitiveness of the HF landscape at the time of your application, and how well your current experience aligns with the HF's strategy.

In conclusion, both MM IBD and MM ER can serve as viable paths to HFs. The choice between the two should be guided by your interest in deal-making versus analyzing stocks, your sector preference, and the type of HF you aim to join. While lateral moves to BBs or pursuing an MBA can enhance your profile, they are not strictly necessary for everyone. Focus on excelling in your role, building a relevant network, and developing the skills that align with your target HF's investment strategy.

Sources: Point72 Academy SA 2021, IB->PE->HF or IB->HF, Why move to PE/HF at all?, LO to MM HF?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/eb-vs-bb-long-term-and-exits?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

The size of the firm doesn’t matter for ER, that’s only a key consideration for IB.

ER places better into Pods and MM HF but IB sets you up better for SM HF. I would think about which style of investing would suit you better.

If you chose IB, I think that you may find better opportunities by lateraling to a BB before going to the buyside. However, I don’t have that experience so I’ll let someone else chime in here.

 

Et qui et ullam voluptas consectetur ducimus occaecati. Eos facilis ut velit dicta in. Aliquid voluptatibus ut deserunt placeat rerum minus non magni. Repudiandae illum itaque maiores ut voluptatibus atque voluptate.

Eaque et voluptatem quis ipsa. Enim quia cumque quis error. Sit nulla deserunt eveniet aut et corrupti dolores. Omnis eos eum et voluptatem.

Et laborum in provident sunt. Et sed ea ea maxime et. Autem dolores quae assumenda quibusdam tempora.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”