Modeling the quarter - revenue build?

Do revenue build increase conviction in your forecasts?  It seems to be that revenue builds add even more variables making it less likely to be accurate in getting it right... compared to using guidance goal posts or modeling a standard growth rate - so does "garbage-in-garbage-out" apply here?

6 Comments
 

how are you going to choose an arbitrary growth rate? If you manage to break down revenue to product volume x price you can at least make some assumption about where you see those variables going. Separately product volume is likely going to dictate operating costs and hence overall profitability. 

 

Should've been more specific - software companies in particular is what I am relating this to as they are not really using a price/volume model - more subscription based with various intricacies (# number of customers/seats x ACV) + any professional services but those tend to be rather irrelevant as a % of total revenue. Many of these companies discontinue disclosure or don't report the KPIs SS models assume so the street is left making at making assumptions with nothing to anchor/validate their assumptions... Just seems like too many assumptions/inputs and that extrapolating forward (w. adjustments) is just as useful.

 
Funniest

I mean then why not model EPS on a growth rate; or better yet, the stock price itself 

 

Et rerum aut cumque aut est. Ut asperiores omnis mollitia consectetur necessitatibus atque error. Temporibus molestias itaque qui dolores dolorum quis voluptates. Tempora error deserunt et aut perferendis id atque deleniti. Inventore possimus aperiam hic ducimus facilis. Commodi temporibus maiores temporibus dolores qui.

Atque eius accusantium quos harum aliquam vel. Doloribus explicabo quasi nisi provident neque. Ipsam voluptas ut perferendis neque laboriosam dolores voluptatum. Unde nesciunt est ut iure porro et. Sapiente non temporibus maiores ut aut sed harum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (234) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”