Pair Trades and Market Neutral Investing

I'm a bit confused on these two terms. Could someone explain a bit on these strategies? I'm aware of L/S, macro, quant/quantamental, activist, distressed/loan to own, and event-driven. But more confused about convergence trading / pair trading. Is it similar to event-driven or merger arb? Any prominent examples/funds? Search function wasn't too helpful. Thanks!

7 Comments
 

Often hedge fund strategies have market exposure or beta. A market-neutral strategy has no long bias or beta. This term can be applied to all types of strategies L/S equity, bond, macro, etc.

Pairs trading, or more often called statistical arbitrage, is usually market neutral. Therefore, these terms are together, but they don't have to be. This method of trading is usually short term, 1 week, and focuses on exploiting breaks in relationships. For example, if the S&P500 opens up 1% and Nasdaq opens down 1%, sell S&P500 and buy Nasdaq to create a market-neutral bet. The view here is that these indexes are correlated and the relationship will return to normal. 

 

The example I see when I search online is long TWTR and short FB. But isn't this bullish towards one company while bearish towards the other? What's the correlation you speak of? Are you saying in this example TWTR and FB are correlated positively because they are both tech social media platforms? And SPY500 and NASDAQ are correlated because they both represent multi-sector companies? Are we ignoring the fact that SPY500 is more tech-weighted? In your example, isn't AAL more concentrated on short-haul flights?

 
Most Helpful

You're thinking about this as a fundamental guy. To a quant, they're not looking at the underlying business as much as they are the price action. To them, Twitter and Facebook (or American and United) are correlated tickers, with historical correlations driven by similar sectors driving their price action, and similar capital flows given similar underlying holders. If there is a slightly off move in one relative to the other, and it doesn't seem to be exogenous (i.e. one is up 1.3%, the other should be up 1.8%, but is only up 1.5%) they try and capture the difference between the two, which will generally correct themselves eventually. You don't do this once, you look at all liquid stocks, with all interdependent relationships, and end up with a huge portfolio of stock. Generally is run market neutral, but sometimes with beta = 1. 

This was developed in the 80's at Morgan Stanley under Tartaglia, and is the basis for DE Shaw and Ren Tech. The simple stat arb that worked in the 80's likely doesn't work today, so I wouldn't go into an interview just talking about looking at short term inefficiency in correlations, as the deeper engines that now probably look at earnings dates, index fund capital flows, dividend-driven capital flows etc. and have a strong risk management program laid on top of it.

 

In maiores magni et rerum non quo molestias. Molestias sint quia illum minima nulla est cum temporibus. Qui occaecati illo non incidunt. Tempora odit voluptatum et porro unde omnis.

Consequuntur reprehenderit illum enim odit veritatis aut. Quia explicabo dolor perferendis sed. Est sapiente eligendi nostrum rerum et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”