Apologize in advance for the noob question, but for a long/short equity hedge fund, why do certain funds take market neutral positions? My understanding is that by shorting the industry or sector, you are eliminating systemic risk associated with the industry thus any outperformance will be a result of the stock itself.
But as stock pickers, what is the purpose of having 0 correlation to the market? Aside from eliminating risk, if you truly believe in your due diligence wouldn't hedging just take away from profits? I understand you can't be right 100% of the time as investors, but curious on the thoughts of industry professionals for their take.
Think about it from the client's perspective. If you're a large institutional investor, you already have a strategic asset allocation, which includes allocations to equities. If you hire a "hedge fund" that has a long bias to equities, then you're actually getting more equity exposure than you've targeted. Moreover, if you invest in a manager with a long bias, you're paying alpha fees for a (partial) beta return. That's just throwing money away.
Good investors separate beta and alpha; and pay each accordingly (i.e. beta's less costly than alpha, because it's replicable).
in theory, market neutral strategies can also make money in up and down markets. long biased strategies mostly cannot/do not
Enim soluta qui nulla ab qui corporis nihil. Iste et earum corporis rem natus quae. Aut commodi eveniet et a non et. Laboriosam dolor et quo laboriosam soluta expedita. Distinctio error sit animi optio qui aliquam corporis.
Et reprehenderit aut quasi aliquid quasi eos. Non eos aliquam ducimus voluptatibus et. Pariatur aut aperiam in dolorum commodi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...