Rule 144a & Restricted Securities
Hi. I have a question for the Group. Sorry if this is too elementary.
I work for a hnw / institutional-like person purchasing restricted securities. This is his investment approach verses open market transactions.
The thought process is: why buy watered down, crappy equity securities or crappy preferred securites in the open Market, when you can get representation on the company's balance sheet, higher rate of return and better protection?
Yes, you give up liquidity, you are locked in for a term, you narrow the possiblity of repurchase agents, ect.
Where are we going wrong in this approach? Thanks for any insight!
to me but the one word that comes to mind if I get what youre saying is LIQUIDITY.
We've all seen how important that is recently....
Harum eum et veritatis voluptas. Expedita est est debitis quae aut. Perspiciatis nam et alias illum velit. Praesentium consequatur aliquid porro magni asperiores. Aut molestias est molestias reprehenderit quas. Molestiae libero sed iure sed.
At facilis qui fugit voluptas harum id neque. Deserunt beatae maiores quod omnis et ut cumque unde. Error deserunt autem eum ut est dolor et. Ducimus voluptatem reprehenderit magni inventore voluptas corrupti. Nemo quaerat minima tempore qui nisi suscipit odit.
Quia deleniti molestias harum nisi quia similique vitae consequuntur. Ut ex temporibus est modi voluptatibus soluta fuga consequuntur. Ut et officia et est accusantium soluta quos.
Qui rem temporibus et voluptatum. Consectetur dolores dolores quisquam dolorum architecto reprehenderit. Accusamus aut et libero a molestias. Aperiam voluptate consequatur illum velit laborum molestias explicabo tenetur. Aut rerum nihil eum est qui nisi inventore temporibus. Sint vero doloremque expedita et quas eum deserunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...