What does Evercore ISI mean when they say we valued something at 11.5x FCF but the company is a life insurer or bank? How do they determine FCF for a bank?

For context, I want to go down the MM route but getting used to this style of modelling. I work in financials and don't really see FCF (use earnings approach or other asset leverage * net investment income style approach). This would really help my learning if someone can help me backsolve it. It's extremely prevalent in Evercore ISI life insurance, P&C, banks.

4 Comments
 

Hey - thanks for your response and offering to help. For context, I am an A1 in PE looking to switch to MMHF and have been learning to model. Have access to research reports but not models. 

A few good companies that seem to be valued using the FCF approach are Jackson, Corebridge. I think the entire life insurance sector covered by Tom Gallagher uses this approach. 

JXN

  • While our $37 price target represents a sizeable discount to peers at just 5-6x FCF (Aug 9 Earnings)
  •  Favorable equity markets / interest rates lead to better FCF than we anticipate (Aug 9 Earnings)
  • additional actuarial refinement cause further pressure on the RBC ratio, suppressing FCF generation (Aug 9 Earnings)
  •  We could see a wide valuation range of around $20 per share (5x FCF) to $36 (9x FCF) before settling into a more stable valuation range. We note that VA heavy peer valuations range from EQH at around 9x FCF, to BHF at 10x, and LNC at 11x. We also suspect that deep value buyers will likely step in at a 20% FCF yield level (or around $20 per share), despite the short term selling pressure from the spin. (September 08, 2021 INITIATE)

https://ibb.co/C8MPwpp

 

Et eius iusto in dolore sunt assumenda sapiente. Dignissimos odio vel quia error similique. Id illo vel voluptatem modi consequatur. Ad autem maiores molestiae dicta aliquam eos.

Illum ratione inventore et rerum. Molestiae rerum aut totam voluptatem iste in blanditiis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $355
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $193
  • Analysts (235) $177
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (277) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”