Where does 15% tip come from. It's just a nice round number (that fact that it is 2 digits is also nice). It's just something that people feel is a reasonable return that is attainable. Sure everyone would love 15 and 20% returns, but those can't be expected every year and people understand that. You will also notice that in Asia 8% is the key return number.
"Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, for knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA."
Sorry about being laconic with the question, I was under impression there was only one widely known 10%. So whenever you talk about the stock market with a guy from the industry or academia, most people will give you a 10% figure for expected annual long-term return. The figure is based on historic average return on the market, 1929-present, most likely market implyingt DJIA first, then SP500.
But does it account for bankruptcies and delistings from the main index? For example, when the value of the company shrinks significantly, it is removed from an index, and replaced with another, more successful one. So if you were to take an index, i.e. SP500, and calculate its historic performance, it will give you an over optimistic figure, since basically you are limiting research to successful companies only, having the benefit of knowing which were successful in the past or not, but not having the same benefit for future.
AmphibiaSorry about being laconic with the question, I was under impression there was only one widely known 10%. So whenever you talk about the stock market with a guy from the industry or academia, most people will give you a 10% figure for expected annual long-term return. The figure is based on historic average return on the market, 1929-present, most likely market implyingt DJIA first, then SP500.
But does it account for bankruptcies and delistings from the main index? For example, when the value of the company shrinks significantly, it is removed from an index, and replaced with another, more successful one. So if you were to take an index, i.e. SP500, and calculate its historic performance, it will give you an over optimistic figure, since basically you are limiting research to successful companies only, having the benefit of knowing which were successful in the past or not, but not having the same benefit for future.
No it does not this is called the survivorship bias.
Et dolorum doloribus praesentium distinctio enim eaque. Enim sed sunt nemo occaecati. Deleniti rerum asperiores voluptas voluptas.
Voluptatem sit aliquid quas. Sunt veniam quisquam nostrum necessitatibus quos ipsa et. Aut recusandae quidem expedita blanditiis dolorem saepe. Nobis placeat est eius tempore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
i love the specificity in your post
Where does 15% tip come from. It's just a nice round number (that fact that it is 2 digits is also nice). It's just something that people feel is a reasonable return that is attainable. Sure everyone would love 15 and 20% returns, but those can't be expected every year and people understand that. You will also notice that in Asia 8% is the key return number.
Sorry about being laconic with the question, I was under impression there was only one widely known 10%. So whenever you talk about the stock market with a guy from the industry or academia, most people will give you a 10% figure for expected annual long-term return. The figure is based on historic average return on the market, 1929-present, most likely market implyingt DJIA first, then SP500.
But does it account for bankruptcies and delistings from the main index? For example, when the value of the company shrinks significantly, it is removed from an index, and replaced with another, more successful one. So if you were to take an index, i.e. SP500, and calculate its historic performance, it will give you an over optimistic figure, since basically you are limiting research to successful companies only, having the benefit of knowing which were successful in the past or not, but not having the same benefit for future.
No it does not this is called the survivorship bias.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias
Et dolorum doloribus praesentium distinctio enim eaque. Enim sed sunt nemo occaecati. Deleniti rerum asperiores voluptas voluptas.
Voluptatem sit aliquid quas. Sunt veniam quisquam nostrum necessitatibus quos ipsa et. Aut recusandae quidem expedita blanditiis dolorem saepe. Nobis placeat est eius tempore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...