Is it possible to move from VC to HF?

I'm in college & did multiple VC internships - I am thinking of switching to public markets (L/S Equity space). I was wondering if it's worth trying to network/recruit now or it's a better idea to do few years of Banking and than try to recruit.

My dream would be to do cross over investing à la Dan Sundheim someday so I think getting public exposure might be super valuable.

19 Comments
 

It's cool to have ambition. It's not cool to be an idiot in any market. Idiot gets slaughtered. 

 
Most Helpful

Oh, how precious.

Let me just take a step back and genuinely admire what's happening here. You've done some VC internships — in college — and you're already mapping your career trajectory to Dan Sundheim. That's not ambition, sweetheart, that's a vision board with a Bloomberg terminal in it. You've essentially told me you've watched a few episodes of a cooking show and you're now wondering whether to apply directly to Michelin or get some kitchen experience first. The audacity is, genuinely, a little inspiring.

Let's talk about your VC internships for a second, because I want to make sure we're being honest about what those actually were. You sat in a WeWork-adjacent office, you formatted some pitch decks, you maybe built a DCF model that a second-year analyst silently rebuilt from scratch after you left for the day, and you attended a few founder meetings where you learned that if you nod slowly and write things down, people assume you're thinking rather than just conscious. You did not generate alpha. You did not manage risk. You did not have a single moment where real capital was on the line and your analysis was the thing standing between a good decision and a catastrophically embarrassing one. You were, and I mean this with the precision of a surgical instrument, a very expensive intern who learned what a cap table is.

And now you want to do long/short equity.

Do you know what long/short equity actually is? Not the romanticized version — not the Midtown office, the Bloomberg screens casting a faint blue glow on someone's angular jawline as they deliver a brilliant variant view on a misunderstood industrial compounder — I mean the actual day-to-day reality of it. It's getting a thesis completely, humiliatingly wrong in front of a portfolio manager who has forgotten more about free cash flow conversion than you will know in the next decade. It's defending a position that's down 20% with new information that actually makes you more convicted, and having the intellectual spine to do so, because you've done the work so thoroughly that you know the difference between price action and fundamental change. It's understanding that being smart — and I'm sure you are smart, everyone who asks questions like this is smart, smart is the floor not the ceiling in this business — is essentially irrelevant without the specific, painstakingly acquired craft of public markets analysis.

You have none of that craft. Zero. You have the enthusiasm of someone who has read a Michael Lewis book on a long flight and felt something stir inside them.

Now. Dan Sundheim. Bless you for name-dropping him, truly, because it tells me exactly where you are mentally. You have identified the apex predator of the ecosystem and decided that is your peer group. That's like a college soccer player watching the Champions League final and thinking "yes, that's the conversation I should be having right now." Dan Sundheim is the product of Wharton, then Viking Global — Viking Global — where he spent over a decade being molded by Andreas Halvorsen, one of the greatest long/short investors of his generation, before becoming their CIO and eventually leaving to raise billions on the strength of a track record and a network that took fifteen years to build. The distance between where you are and where Dan Sundheim started — started, not ended up — is so vast that using him as a reference point in your current planning is roughly equivalent to a kid in a school play saying their dream is to be Meryl Streep "someday" and wondering whether to do the spring musical or go straight to Broadway auditions.

And yet — infuriatingly, I know — yes. It is possible. People with unconventional backgrounds do make it into serious long/short seats. It happens. The world occasionally rewards the person who takes the weird path, who builds genuine expertise in a sector, who shows up with something differentiated and earns their way in through sheer quality of thought.

But those people? They weren't asking this question. They were too busy doing the work.

Go do banking. Learn what a normalized EBITDA margin actually means and why it's the beginning of the analysis rather than the end. Learn to read a 10-K the way a forensic accountant reads a crime scene. Learn to be wrong about something that matters and figure out why you were wrong with enough rigor that you don't repeat it. Build the foundation that this career actually requires, rather than trying to skip to the chapter where you're managing a multi-billion dollar crossover book and getting profiled in institutional investor.

The dream is fine. The timeline is delusional. And the fact that you need someone to explain the difference is, honestly, the most important data point in this entire conversation.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

lhommeparfaite

nice AI slop brother but you are not wrong! thanks :)

You could tell?! A hedgie you may soon make. 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

I don't know why people are being so weird on this thread.

Going from VC to HF becomes more and more difficult over time because the skillsets do not really overlap. There is a reason why most crossover funds keep private teams separate from public teams. You should ideally do an analyst program with rigorous training (like banking) post-grad for a few years and decide what you want to do down the line.

 

I'm gonna be straight with you, hedge funds are not hiring that much right now. All my buddies at big name and mid market shops are basically saying there's maybe some slots for ML focused quants, but for the most part unless you've got a decade+ of experience and strong background a specific field, most firms are just not that interested. HFs are just a bit full. Headcounts swelled a lot in recent years and there just isn't a big need for more. 

 

Btw that answer to your title question - No, the probability is sub-2%. No one in their right mind in 2026 would hire a VC kid for public equities at a HF. Why would you when there's tens of thousands of folks you can get from LO / sell side ER / other HFs? The skill sets between VC and L/S HF have like 5% crossover at best

 

Dolores dolore molestiae aut. Perferendis sed rerum qui. Quod quia et est porro esse quis alias. Aliquam et quasi porro.

A occaecati earum neque porro. Porro voluptate ut cumque. Officia earum dolorem illum ipsum soluta tempore. Ullam nulla sapiente necessitatibus blanditiis.

Voluptas modi deserunt et quam dolor. Exercitationem voluptatem vel vel perferendis autem distinctio qui autem. Optio veritatis nulla molestias ea enim. Omnis aliquam voluptas tempore iste. Facilis culpa voluptatem et soluta.

Iusto quis quo deserunt eius eum dolores. Et fuga vel dolor inventore. Non commodi necessitatibus ut molestias ut qui atque. Quaerat veniam ipsum non voluptatem neque nulla quo expedita.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”