Why do MM fundamental L/S equity pods shoot for that 3-5% range?

I know this is a dumb question but can someone please explain to me the reasoning/math as to why pods aim for returns in the 3-5% range? Im assuming it has something to do with the market neutral + tight risk framework that they are dealing with? 

27 Comments
 

I've also wondered about this. Pretty new to the space. Could someone elaborate more on the answer, besides the leverage point which frankly I dont understand?

 

The 3-5% is before leverage, so assuming 5x leverage it becomes 15-25% at the larger portfolio level. The strategies are market neutral, so any long position is hedged by a corresponding short. This means the fund can’t benefit from big gains in the overall market and has to target tiny amounts of alpha in pair trades. This makes the returns uncorrelated to the market, which is very attractive to LPs.

 

Super helpful - thanks a lot to both of you. Does running market neutral make it very difficult or even impossible to have massive returns like 30-40% a year given you almost always have a corresponding short? I remember Melvin Capital had such big years and it was market neutral.

Also, just because everyone is putting the same trades, can you not still be market neutral?

 
Most Helpful

No it has nothing really to do with leverage. It is because the percentage return is quoted on gross notional of the book. Why do MM shops do this? Likely because it strokes PMs egos to say they are running billion dollar books. 
 

If you run a $500m notional book, $250m long $250m short, the actual capital you need to post to your PB as margin, which is all anyone really cares about, is likely no more than $30-40m. No PM wants to say they are running only $40m so alas the capital base inflation is born. 

 

Qui nulla labore ut deserunt distinctio sit. Molestiae cum ab libero libero deleniti recusandae assumenda. Animi ullam nam est ex in. Cumque ipsam itaque id fugiat aliquam omnis ad explicabo. Dolores enim ea inventore ut. Eaque quisquam dignissimos provident molestiae dolores perspiciatis et impedit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”