Why is MM HF > LO harder than SM > LO?

Hate to regurgitate on this topic here, but as an industry outsider genuinely curious why MM HF > LO AM is regarded as virtually impossible vs moving from SM. 

Is it mainly bc of the prestige / filtering factor?

Bc in the end isn't the day to day job more or less similar as an analyst if you're doing market neutral L/S equities? 

 

Associate 3 in IB - Cov, hey, look at the bright side, at least you didn't get a ton of monkey shit thrown at you...here is my best guess on threads that might be helpful:

More suggestions...

I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

There is a perception that MM HF analysts focus all their time on "the direction of the numbers" and thus lack creativity or the ability to identify truly great investments where business model inflecting, etc.  I think this is wrong but not a completely unwarranted POV if you've met enough MM folks.  Also, pod model is high turnover and often valuation insensitive (not always) which doesn't work well if the goal is to maximize after-tax returns in a concentrated book. 

 

Thanks for this, that makes things a lot clearer. 

Can I ask why this setup came to be, is it driven simply from the business model of internal short-term competition at MMs that inevitably compel them to chase quarters? But I don't get how SMs dont have this pressure bc surely they get short-term heat from investors as well. 

I'm really just curious in earnest and didn't get why I was getting monkey-shtted. 

 

Because earnings revisions are the most significant driver of short-term alpha.  You can isolate and lever this alpha with a market-neutral/factor-neutral risk model to deliver an uncorrelated stream of HSD-LDD returns.  SM do have pressures to perform quarterly and it is why they are losing 90-100% of incremental market share to multi-manager platforms where gross is allocated ruthlessly in an up/out culture that removes complacency.  Theoretically SMs should be able to take advantage of near-term volatility created by the pod-induced / passive market structure which is why medium / longer-term focus is valued by fund investors; however, in practice (my view) most end up delivering a return stream that looks like levered beta masquerading as market neutral.  Basically they get lazy.

 

Short version is that on average, the skillset for MM (short term catalysts, perception is king) is incongruent with what’s required for a LO (long-term driven, fundamentals biggest key to story). SM likely has longer term holds vs MM (though highly variable and generally more focused on fundamentals so more natural fit with LO depending on strategy

 

All of the above makes sense but also because there are 200 pod analysts for 1 SM seat, so obv existing SMers will be more valued when competing against MMers

 

Ullam quia corporis odit. Id rem aut eveniet nam.

Laudantium dolorem aliquam animi aliquid rem tenetur. Reprehenderit commodi voluptatem delectus nam ut inventore. Minima sunt placeat et facilis nulla blanditiis. Qui minus qui unde voluptatem nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”