Broadcom (AVGO) might be the best AI infrastructure bet nobody's talking about enough

Been digging into AVGO and wanted to share the thesis because I think it's underrated relative to how much airtime NVDA gets.

TL;DR: Broadcom is two businesses duct-taped together — explosive custom AI silicon growth, hedged by a software cash cow (VMware) that prints predictable FCF. That combo is why the stock supports a premium multiple that would normally scare me off.

The numbers: FY2025 revenue +24% to $63.89B, adj. EBITDA $43B (+35%), FCF $26.9B. Q2 FY26 revenue hit $22.19B (+48% YoY), AI segment alone did $10.8B on 143% growth. Guidance for Q3 has AI revenue growth above 200%. This isn't a "story stock" — the growth is showing up in the actual financials quarter over quarter.

Why the model is different from NVDA: NVIDIA sells merchant GPUs under its own brand. Broadcom instead helps hyperscalers (Google, Meta, OpenAI) design their own custom ASICs, while the hyperscaler eats the capex and inventory risk at TSMC. Broadcom just collects IP licensing + design/integration fees. Result: 78.6% gross margin in this segment — actually higher than NVDA's ~73.5%. It's basically a royalty business wrapped in a semiconductor wrapper.

Why do hyperscalers bother? A custom ASIC tuned to one workload cuts cost-per-token by 50-67% vs. general-purpose GPUs. At billions of tokens/day that pays back the chip design spend inside a year. Broadcom + Marvell are basically the only two players (Broadcom ~70% share, Marvell 20-25%), and Broadcom's confirmed AI backlog is north of $73B.

Client list is the real moat:

  • Google — TPU dev deal through 2031
  • Anthropic — reserved 3.5GW of TPU capacity starting 2027 (Mizuho thinks this alone is worth $21B-$42B to AVGO by 2027)
  • Meta — custom MTIA chip on 2nm, contract through 2029 (Hock Tan literally left Meta's board to advise Zuck directly on silicon)
  • OpenAI — 6th ASIC customer, $10B project, >1GW deployment targeted 2027
  • ByteDance + one undisclosed name

That's basically every major AI lab locked into multi-year hardware roadmaps with AVGO as the design partner. The $100B AI revenue target for 2027 isn't a slide-deck number, it's contracted backlog math.

The networking angle people miss: Everyone talks about chips, fewer people talk about the Ethernet vs. InfiniBand fight happening underneath. InfiniBand (NVDA/Mellanox) has been the standard for GPU-to-GPU interconnect, but at 10k+ GPU cluster scale the optics start failing constantly — 4,000 GPUs need 8,000+ transceivers, and at >5% annual failure rates you're looking at multiple hardware failures a week.

Broadcom backed the Ultra Ethernet Consortium to push Ethernet as the open alternative — comparable performance, way better fault tolerance (30x faster failover). Their Tomahawk 6 switch (102.4 Tbps, shipped 2025) has Scale-Up Ethernet, which lets you link up to 512 accelerators over standard Ethernet instead of NVDA's proprietary NVLink. NVIDIA's competing Spectrum-X1600 isn't expected until 2H26 at earliest — that's a real lead, not a rounding error in this industry.

VMware = the boring part that makes the whole thing work: Post-acquisition, Broadcom killed perpetual licenses, collapsed 70+ SKUs into 4 mega-bundles, forced a 16-core-per-socket minimum, and gutted the partner network from 4,500+ to ~300. Customers are seeing 200-500% cost increases on renewal. Brutal for the customer, but software gross margin is now 93% and segment operating margin is 78%. High switching costs mean enterprises grumble and pay rather than migrate off. This is the part of the business that funds AI R&D without touching debt.

Risks I'm tracking:

  • Marvell is growing faster off a smaller base (~60% YoY vs AVGO's ~40%), positioned as the "second source" for AWS/Microsoft
  • NVDA just bought Groq for $20B (LPU chips) — already drawing antitrust attention from Warren/Blumenthal
  • Cerebras IPO'd at $56.4B, wafer-scale approach could disrupt the ASIC paradigm
  • Apple is moving to in-house Wi-Fi/BT chips (Proxima), though AVGO keeps the RF filter business + new server AI chip deal
  • $62.65B long-term debt post-VMware, though leverage dropped to 1.2x and S&P upgraded to A-

Valuation: Trailing P/E ~62x looks scary in isolation, but forward FY27 P/E is ~34x, and PEG sits at 0.83 (sub-1.0 = growth outpacing price). Median PT $420-507, bulls (Susquehanna, BofA) see $640.

Curious what others think — anyone modeling AVGO independent of the NVDA narrative, or is this still mostly "buy the AI basket" thinking? Also curious how people are thinking about the VMware churn risk longer-term once contracts start coming up for renewal in bulk.

2 Comments
 

Broadcom (AVGO) presents a compelling case as an AI infrastructure play that diverges from the NVIDIA-dominated narrative. Here's a breakdown of the key points:

1. Dual Business Model: Explosive AI Growth + Stable Software Cash Flow

  • AI Silicon Growth: Broadcom's custom ASIC model for hyperscalers (Google, Meta, OpenAI, etc.) offers a high-margin, royalty-like revenue stream. With a 78.6% gross margin in this segment, it outpaces NVIDIA's ~73.5%.
  • VMware Stability: The VMware acquisition provides predictable free cash flow (FCF) with 93% gross margins in software. This cash flow funds AI R&D without over-leveraging the balance sheet.

2. Financials and Growth Metrics

  • FY2025 revenue projected at $63.89B (+24%), with adj. EBITDA at $43B (+35%) and FCF at $26.9B.
  • AI revenue growth is staggering, with Q2 FY26 AI revenue hitting $10.8B (+143% YoY) and Q3 guidance projecting over 200% growth.
  • Confirmed AI backlog exceeds $73B, supporting the $100B AI revenue target for 2027.

3. Competitive Edge in Custom ASICs

  • Broadcom's custom ASICs reduce cost-per-token by 50-67% compared to general-purpose GPUs, making them highly attractive for hyperscalers.
  • Dominant market share (~70%) in the custom ASIC space, with Marvell as the only significant competitor (~20-25% share).

4. Networking Advantage: Ethernet vs. InfiniBand

  • Broadcom's push for Ethernet as an alternative to NVIDIA's InfiniBand offers better fault tolerance and scalability for large GPU clusters.
  • The Tomahawk 6 switch (102.4 Tbps, shipping in 2025) provides a lead over NVIDIA's Spectrum-X1600, expected in 2H26.

5. Risks to Monitor

  • Competition: Marvell's faster growth (~60% YoY) and NVIDIA's acquisition of Groq could challenge Broadcom's dominance.
  • Disruption: Cerebras' wafer-scale approach and Apple's in-house chip development could pose long-term threats.
  • Debt: Post-VMware acquisition, Broadcom's long-term debt stands at $62.65B, though leverage is manageable at 1.2x.
  • VMware Churn: Aggressive pricing changes could lead to customer churn when contracts come up for renewal.

6. Valuation

  • Trailing P/E of ~62x may seem high, but forward FY27 P/E of ~34x and a PEG ratio of 0.83 suggest growth justifies the valuation.
  • Median price target ranges from $420 to $507, with bullish estimates as high as $640.

Conclusion

Broadcom's unique positioning as a custom ASIC provider with a stable software cash cow makes it a differentiated AI infrastructure play. While risks exist, the combination of high-margin growth, a dominant client list, and a strong financial foundation supports the bullish thesis. For investors looking beyond NVIDIA, Broadcom offers a compelling alternative with significant upside potential.

Sources: Stop AI Takeover in 6 Months or Less | The Daily Peel | 3/31/23, Don't you hate too much money?| The Daily Peel | 7/30/21, Review My Stock Pitch, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investing/winning-the-war-on-inflation-the-daily-peel-452023?customgpt=1, Tim Cook Ripping Lines | The Daily Peel | 6/6/2023

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Autem ut dolores labore ab aperiam explicabo. Excepturi eum aut at modi hic aut qui. Est qui qui modi aut harum.

Voluptatem reiciendis aperiam maxime minima laudantium iure unde autem. Aliquam molestiae similique rerum. Sit quas aliquam inventore ipsam totam sequi molestiae occaecati. Fuga ratione minima quasi quasi voluptates pariatur. Est illo et rerum velit.

Sunt recusandae ipsam magnam. In sunt earum quis repellendus et minima deleniti. Id vel aliquam blanditiis voluptatum sed. Corrupti laborum ea fuga est at mollitia qui. Minus voluptatem illo debitis. Fugiat exercitationem repudiandae enim nihil non et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”