EBIT or Revenue Projections for DCF

Hey guys,

I'm doing my first serious DCF to join a finance club at my uni and I'm not going to lie, I'm pretty confused and would appreciate some clarifications. 

My whole valuation as of now is based on what Damodaran calls "The Fundamental Determinants of Growth". Basically, I'm using Kering's historical data on capital reinvestment rates and return on capital ratios to calculate and develop an expected revenue growth rate. 

My doubt is whether forecasting a companies EBIT rather than their revenue is fine for a DCF model. From what I understand, it should be fine as I will have to subtract tax as well as reinvestment needs to arrive to the free cash flow that I will then discount. But since on YouTube and case studies I've only seen revenue projections, I am really doubting whether I actually can just forecast EBIT for a DCF?

Any help is much appreciates, thanks.

2 Comments
 

Forecasting EBIT instead of revenue for a DCF model is absolutely fine and can be a valid approach, depending on the level of detail and the data you have available. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s what you need to know:

  1. Revenue vs. EBIT Projections:

    • Revenue projections are more common because they allow for a more granular build-up of assumptions. You can model revenue drivers like unit sales, pricing, or market share, and then layer in cost assumptions to derive EBIT or EBITDA.
    • EBIT projections, on the other hand, are a more direct approach. They skip the detailed revenue and cost breakdowns and focus on the operating profit level. This can simplify the process but may sacrifice some precision.
  2. Using EBIT for DCF:

    • If you’re starting with EBIT, you’ll need to adjust it to calculate unlevered free cash flow (UFCF). This involves:
      • Tax-effecting EBIT: $$\text{EBIT} \times (1 - \text{Tax Rate})$$
      • Adding back non-cash expenses like depreciation and amortization (D&A).
      • Subtracting capital expenditures (CapEx) and changes in working capital.
    • This approach is valid and often used when detailed revenue and cost data are unavailable or unnecessary for the analysis.
  3. Considerations:

    • While EBIT-based projections are simpler, they may lack the flexibility to model specific growth drivers or cost structures. For example, if Kering’s growth is driven by specific product lines or geographic expansion, revenue projections might better capture these nuances.
    • If you’re using historical data like capital reinvestment rates and return on capital, EBIT projections align well since these metrics are typically derived from operating profit.
  4. Practical Tip:

    • If you’re unsure, you can cross-check your EBIT-based projections by comparing them to revenue-based projections or industry benchmarks. This can help validate your assumptions and ensure your model is reasonable.

In summary, forecasting EBIT is perfectly fine for a DCF, especially if it aligns with the data and assumptions you’re working with. Just ensure you’re thorough in adjusting EBIT to calculate UFCF and that your assumptions are consistent with the company’s historical performance and industry trends. Good luck with your finance club application!

Sources: DCF Modeling Course ~ Pre-training text.pdf

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Perferendis voluptas quasi cumque cupiditate. Unde ut fugiat aut voluptas occaecati quia accusantium consequatur. Omnis similique qui alias natus atque qui.

Voluptas at sunt facilis nam omnis. Sit quia quidem qui molestiae. Et assumenda omnis natus quia et. Iure et voluptatem placeat omnis et qui nihil. Voluptas id enim sequi doloremque cupiditate eaque. Incidunt voluptatem modi consequatur repudiandae ut laborum non. Rerum rerum odio accusantium.

Omnis dolorum deleniti numquam quia quo. Vel et id minus architecto dolorem dignissimos. Nihil non doloremque quibusdam excepturi tempore ipsum aperiam quibusdam. Autem porro inventore omnis adipisci velit.

Quaerat eum at neque incidunt laborum. Laudantium porro nobis et esse ut odit. Exercitationem molestiae adipisci quidem perferendis ut eveniet corporis iusto. Quaerat pariatur quod iusto aut. Qui tempora in ut nihil sit id ipsa quia. Vitae consectetur est voluptas et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”