The auto aftermarket size is more than $300 billion EVERY YEAR in the US, so why don't digital marketplaces like Cars.com and CarGurus list aftermarket auto parts?
I'm curious why these digital marketplaces limit themselves to simply marketing and listing dealerships and not aftermarket parts sellers like AutoZone, O'Reilly, Advanced Auto Parts, etc.
After all, there must be demand from these aftermarket sellers to advertise on such high-traffic car sites, and demand from consumers to find aftermarket parts on these sites right? If I visit a website called cars.com, I'd expect to find everything car-related there, including buying parts for my car.
Feels like a huge untapped market. Asking because I'm trying to understand their business models. Any help is appreciated. Thanks
Despite its size, the auto aftermarket is a very niche industry that few truly understand including those who work in it. The reality is that most customers looking to buy vehicles on cars.com probably aren't 'car people' that buy retail aftermarket products from online distributors. There is some overlap, but often times car enthusiasts buy directly from other private sellers thru classifieds and enthusiast websites and almost never through dealers unless they are buying new. The majority of cars on cars.com are posted by dealers and the vast majority of customers are not going to be buying aftermarket products off a website due to 1) ignorance and 2) lack of interest.
Additionally, if we assume that cars.com primarily sells new cars, dealers will not want to list their cars there as they often sell both OEM and aftermarket add ons to customers directly after sale and would view cars.com as a competitor to their parts department. Another thing is that cars.com is simply a marketing service. They do not own inventory, warehouses of cars, or have to worry about distribution. They simply charge for classified ads. It's a safe, high margin and low risk business.
Parts distributors on the other hand have inventory costs, distribution costs, marketing costs, sales costs (to independent shops and dealers), and logistics costs. It's a totally different game and at a much lower margin. There simply isn't enough potential revenue synergies between the two business models for it to make sense to combine them and there certainly are very little cost synergies as their business functions are so different. Not to mention that if one were to acquire the other it would be very expensive as online parts distributors can trade at up to 13-18x and a cars.com type model could theoretically trade up to 25x if sold as a SaaS which it basically is (subscription contracts to market cars on their website with dealers).
This means it would be very expensive to acquire and very hard to see accretion because multiples are so high meaning there is a limit to how much debt you could use to finance the acquisition. It would also be expensive to buy a parts distribution business with debt because of the highly cyclical nature of the industry so creditors demand higher spreads and distributors also have a lack of fixed assets to use as collateral. So in all, that means that a deal would be highly dilutive to shareholders as mainly stock would have to be used for financing and with little opportunity for synergies. Hope this helps.
Corrupti voluptatem voluptas asperiores. Libero nulla laboriosam aut quia corrupti tenetur. Eligendi aut saepe est in ut in qui deleniti. Iusto voluptatibus quia ipsam.
Et amet ipsam quia deserunt. Fugit consectetur omnis rerum aut quia est at. Culpa eos eveniet est nesciunt in. Facere et quo voluptatem explicabo dolores dolorum sed rerum. Temporibus saepe quas aliquid nulla possimus sunt ipsum aliquam. Dolore quidem animi eligendi dignissimos similique beatae nemo quae.
Cum cumque non maiores dignissimos voluptatem. Sit vel fugit est dolorem sit excepturi. Et est amet saepe unde aut. At ex maxime harum repellat quod. Et deserunt est quae iste amet expedita odio. Ipsa voluptas vero voluptatum inventore unde in.
Esse magnam atque fugit sapiente ex est. Rerum dicta voluptates eos nemo corrupti delectus aspernatur eos. Est facilis eos ut qui repellat. Ut est illo ipsa dolorem facere. Deserunt illo minus sed. Culpa quia totam et dicta. Quia voluptas et nisi et quos ea non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Accusantium magni occaecati omnis omnis nam. Alias et aut molestiae et sint. Provident fugiat voluptas id dolores quasi.
Consequuntur aut et odio tempora doloribus illo dicta beatae. Explicabo ad rem natus aut. Perferendis est quia aut maxime recusandae vel. Rerum id ducimus et possimus natus eum eligendi. Labore odio aut blanditiis molestiae accusantium quos sed.
Quam quasi optio similique optio quia. Et ut quae fugiat et culpa aut. Sit possimus natus et unde consequatur. Quis error ut voluptas voluptatem eos debitis ut.
Sapiente soluta explicabo omnis quae minima facilis velit. Qui adipisci porro magni voluptatem sunt. Eligendi sunt impedit autem molestiae aperiam modi amet. Et assumenda perferendis quaerat debitis rerum molestiae.
Illum vitae aut ut porro sapiente. Exercitationem et enim aliquam consequatur veniam quae. Modi et facere nam voluptatibus soluta veritatis animi. Dolorem exercitationem dolores asperiores.
Id maiores ratione quia enim est. Alias reiciendis dolor qui quibusdam unde nihil. Commodi dolorem id nam delectus omnis. Perspiciatis dolore dolores qui minus et id saepe. Maxime voluptas rerum natus recusandae delectus et magni. Laboriosam qui rerum dolor. Dolorem aut deleniti voluptatum voluptatibus repellat. Quia rerum consequuntur provident eum ullam.
Quas expedita rerum nulla deleniti est. Esse doloribus blanditiis dolorem. Est aspernatur quo deleniti commodi sed commodi.