Macro Monkey Says
Man, You ‘Facturing?
No, you are most definitely not manufacturing, at least according to the latest data dump we got yesterday.
The Institute for Supply Management, aka the ISM, aka the gang reporting all the important manufacturing data, popped off yesterday morning, bringing us all kinds of new figures. I’ll stop beating around the bush now so we can get to it.
For the first time since 2009, every single component of US manufacturing, as quantified by ISM, was below the key level of 50, with readings above 50 representing expansion and below representing contraction across the sector.
At the same time, S&P Global dropped its own measure of US manufacturing PMI. The two readings differ slightly, with the primary distinctions including the following:
- Slightly different subcomponents, with ISM giving mildly more focus to things like new orders and customer backlogs, whereas S&P lasers in on output
- S&P equal-weights all its subcomponents while ISM weights them based on “perceived importance”
- ISM surveys 300 US-based purchasing managers, while S&P Global is more, well, global, surveying purchasing managers in ~40 countries
Otherwise, their readings are basically the same. But these differences can speak to a world of difference.
In March, the ISM Manufacturing PMI declined from the already-low 47.7 reading in February to 46.3 in March. Meanwhile, S&P’s PMI metric posted a score of 49.2 in February, increasing from the 47.3 level posted in February.
Wise apes out there may have noticed that one reading declined while the other gained, so naturally, we ask, what gives?
Let’s go back to those differences. Variations in the way these measures are calculated are the primary suspects, with an emphasis on things like:
- S&P Global, like Davey Day Trader, is global, suggesting US manufacturing may have suffered worse than the rest of the world last month
- ISM tends to give higher weightings to factors like new orders, which just so happened to get slammed even worse than the benchmark PMI in March
Or maybe it’s both. The cratering seen by new orders last month from 47.0 to a disgustingly low 44.3 makes us want to cry for all these poor, sweet factory owners. They might be the only ones that have it worse than landlords right now (sad!).
But it’s important to keep in mind exactly what we’re measuring. Manufacturing pertains to goods, but our economy is driven at least a nice 69% by services as opposed to the goods in question here.
And we’ll get service data later this week when both ISM and S&P report the same measures but for that side of the equation.
So yes, the slowdown in manufacturing last month can be seen as nightmare fuel, but context is key. For one, JPow is probably pretty happy to see the production of goods slow down, particularly in the case of new orders, as this is the clearest possible sign of a slowdown in demand for goods.
At the same time, this dropoff came during a month in which we experienced not one but TWO of the largest bank failures (2nd and 3rd, to be clear) in US history.
Manufacturing is an incredibly capital-intensive space (duh) that relies heavily on lending in order to expand production. So, it’s not exactly a surprise that production clamped up alongside capital, although the speed of the reaction is impressive, to say the least.
And, of course, 2023 has officially been the year where nothing makes sense. Economics is far from a science like physics, chemistry, or Tinder rizz, so macro events rarely make sense anytime in history. But c’mon, ever since C-19 showed up, it’s not just weird; it’s totally backwards.
|
Aspernatur suscipit esse sed rerum possimus explicabo. Repudiandae aut aut incidunt iste amet adipisci. Aut tempora et beatae. Animi mollitia atque dignissimos libero aut quibusdam pariatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...