$107 Billion Under The Table
I wrote a while back about Morgan Stanley taking the rains as the world's top investment bank. In prepping the topic, I went back and looked over how much TARP money they and the other bulge brackets received during the bailout. Most easily available sources placed the number around $10 billion. New information has recently emerged which places the actual figure at closer to $107 billion.
Acting on a Freedom of Information Act request, the government has recently released nearly 30,000 pages of information relating to transactions taking place throughout September of 2008. The following graphic is a stark reminder of how much the whole affair was a game of Three Card. As many (myself included) would dub Citi and BofA "nationalized banks", Morgan Stanley actually functioned as the extended arm of the Federal Reserve throughout the peak of the crisis. Funny how that reality somehow got lost in the shuffle.
It shouldn't come as much of a shock that Morgan has emerged from the crisis in the manner of Lazarus. What should come as a shock is how blind of an eye we have all turned to these events. A look under the hood of Morgan's prime-brokerage business doesn't reveal much as to how much/if at all their liquidity balances are self regulated three years after events which led to various hedge funds pulling ~$130 billion out of the bank in a few solitary weeks.
With the risk of another recession looming and the smell of panic returning to the air, I am curious to hear if any of you guys think the risk environment and profiles of some of the TARP recipient banks have really changed all that much?
I am not trying to bring up panic or point fingers. I do, however, find it pretty much amazing that Morgan has been able to so casually side step the spotlight over the past few years. It gets my scalp itching for my good ol' tin foil hat and wondering how such a steamy turd has managed to chill out under the rug, while the rest of the industry burned and continues to tingle from the funk...
Whoa whoa whoa...we haven't ALL turned a blind eye. I've been ranting and raving about this shit for the last 2.5 years!
Everyone's too busy focusing on Goldman Sachs and Bank of America right now. It just isn't an interesting story for people.
Keep in mind, Lehman himself, in the flesh( no pun intended) was once the de facto long arm of the U.S. government in Europe, circa the end of WW2. Though I don't disagree with anything you said, I know if Lloyd's of Broad Street can get it in the ass...anyone can. Time will tell...
This is why sometimes it pays to be number 2.
I don't know all the details, but it looks like MS had more of a classic "run on the bank" situation than Citi or BOFA, who were sitting on top of a massive pile of worthless mortgage products, and still are.
Est necessitatibus et consequatur et suscipit quae. Ad similique totam omnis. Quidem quis ut eos assumenda qui recusandae. Occaecati ut ducimus et accusantium temporibus sed. Ut quasi pariatur sequi iste praesentium recusandae distinctio ut.
Facilis occaecati ipsum numquam omnis rem delectus. Aut accusamus voluptas repellendus et repudiandae minima non qui. Repellat quas amet dignissimos non repudiandae. Facilis mollitia itaque et eos voluptatem blanditiis non veritatis. Dolor quisquam reiciendis ad. Ipsa perferendis cum animi veniam provident est consequatur ut.
Explicabo ut voluptatem iure molestias molestias distinctio facilis. Facere eveniet quia est maiores. Possimus corporis quo qui.
Quo dicta ut fugiat veniam omnis. Sunt velit aperiam aspernatur eius.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...