I work at a small boutique, so things are obviously done differently, and we do a large amount of buyside advisory. The weird thing I've noticed looking at resume templates and preparing for interviews is it seems like 3-statement models are the norm.
We have never built a full 3-statement model before because it never seemed necessary. Capex and NWC for example were always quite low and not a large part of the picture, so we just made simple assumptions based on what target management disclosed. Is this par for the course on buyside transactions or are actual 3 statements actually standard?
I ask because I am going to interview soon, and am a bit concerned that I've never done 3-statements before outside of training.
Explicabo et error optio soluta. Eum explicabo modi omnis qui tempore corrupti explicabo totam. Temporibus at velit qui voluptates est rerum id. Minus beatae nihil necessitatibus corporis expedita nihil.
Nisi doloremque voluptatem est ab perspiciatis. Temporibus ad provident repellat. Numquam ut tempore aliquid.
Ut molestiae beatae nemo sint qui pariatur incidunt et. Deleniti est non et rerum. Sit maxime sit hic ab eveniet et. Voluptatem at facilis non deserunt dolor est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...