A bunch of questions on securitization of cash flows

Say I'm looking at an entertainment company that has rights contracts with sponsors, broadcasters, etc. These contracts have fixed and variable components - the fixed components are predetermined annual payments listed in the contracts, and the variable components are based on viewership.

Would it be possible to securitize these contracts and, if so, what would that depend on? I'm assuming just the fixed component would be securitized? How important is the term of the contracts to investors in such specialty products? Do they have to be long, or really long, term? I'm guessing the default spread would be based on the creditworthiness of the contract counter parties? So if the counter parties have high corporate credit ratings, these will be cheaper than bank debt? That's my guess, at least.

Where would such securitizations fall in the debt structure and how would the other creditors feel about it? It seems like the cash streams would be pledged against the securitized product, which would affect the cash flows available to senior secured. How would banks view this in their credit analysis? Obviously it would still be viewed as debt, so it wouldn't allow them to extend their leverage, but I'm guessing it'll allow them to take a chunk of cheaper debt than if they did the whole thing with bank debt.

How expensive is this sort of thing to do? What's the process behind the securitization? Are there a variety of different methods or instruments these can be packaged into? Seems like it could be a good option, I just don't know enough about it.

3 Comments
 

Important key metrics: - Run-rate net cash flow - Stability of cash flows: contract length - long term preferred (relative to securitization note maturity), termination clauses, diversity of revenue streams etc. - Nature of asset (mission critical to operations) - Collateral (liquation value in a worst case scenario) - Borrower's credit rating

Pros: - Generally cheaper than bank debt

Cons: - More complicated. Each securitization is generally for a fairly unique asset base

 
Best Response
"TorontoMonkey1328"

Important key metrics:
- Run-rate net cash flow
- Stability of cash flows: contract length - long term preferred (relative to securitization note maturity), termination clauses, diversity of revenue streams etc.
- Nature of asset (mission critical to operations)
- Collateral (liquation value in a worst case scenario)
- Borrower's credit rating

Pros:
- Generally cheaper than bank debt

Cons:
- More complicated. Each securitization is generally for a fairly unique asset base

Thanks! What kind of contract length is securitizable? 5 year? 10 year? Obviously longer term is better but I didn't know what the lower bound would be. Wouldn't the securitization note maturity just be the length of the contract/cash stream?

When you say diversity of revenue stream, what are you referring to? Are you talking about the company's revenue? What factor does that have?

If it's a stream of cash flows from a rights contract, what would the collateral be? You mean they'd have to pledge separate collateral? Wouldn't it just be a non-collateralized cash flow note? Wouldn't they just factor the receivables from the contract payments to an SPV that acts as the securitization mechanism, thereby insulating it from the company's credit risk?

Would the borrower's credit rating be the company securitizing the cash flows, or the payor of the fees to the company?

 

Temporibus architecto est distinctio molestiae accusamus. Vero consectetur minima quis distinctio voluptatem sint tenetur. Expedita facilis ullam ut vel ipsum et hic.

Doloribus quisquam nostrum facere dolore velit tempora. Doloremque doloremque cumque necessitatibus sunt itaque pariatur voluptatem. Nesciunt accusamus aperiam rerum quis. Sunt consequatur fugit rem similique fuga porro.

Debitis dolores facilis quod nemo distinctio voluptatibus. Temporibus cumque voluptatum qui magni. Voluptatem voluptatem sed ea ab.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”