Accretion/Dilution
Can someone simply explain when a deal would be accretive and when a deal would be dilutive? Please explain in simplest terms.
Can someone simply explain when a deal would be accretive and when a deal would be dilutive? Please explain in simplest terms.
| +67 | PWP acquisition by Piper cancelled | 27 | 1d |
| +60 | Is my MD a grifter? 16 years, 8 firms | 16 | 8h |
| +43 | No return offer - UPDATE. | 12 | 1d |
| +40 | Article: UBS Wall Street Rebuild Is a Study in Management Failure | 7 | 2d |
| +40 | "Corporate & Investment Banking" Analyst - Why? | 35 | 1h |
| +29 | Lack of talent in IB! | 25 | 12h |
| +28 | What Are The Best Boutiques 2026/2027 | 16 | 13h |
| +24 | Wells Fargo Calling Themselves a BB? | 16 | 15h |
| +24 | Moat of modelling in PE/Finance completely vanished; | 3 | 1d |
| +23 | Internal lateral from coverage to M&A (focused on coverage) | 8 | 3h |
Career Resources
a deal is accretive when it gets done and dilutive when it doesn't
Eveniet dolorem officiis delectus est sapiente. Omnis animi ipsum dolore. Ducimus officia quos voluptatem animi unde recusandae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...