Accretive / Dilutive Question
Hi,
I'm trying to get my head around merger consequences analysis and whether a deal is accretive / dilutive when funded through debt.
I understand that the deal will always be accretive if:
Net income of target + tax effected synergies > tax effected D&A step up + tax effected cost of debt
However, I've read on the forum that if the cost of debt is higher than the equity yield ( inverse of the P/E ratio), then the deal will be dilutive. I can't really get my head around this, I understand it logically, but I don't see how it is true in practice.
The cost of debt is going to be a small percentage of the purchase price - this is not linked to the actual earnings of the target. As long as the additional earnings from the acquisition are higher than the interest expense, surely the deal will always be Accretive regardless? Would the cost of debt not have to be huge to outweigh the additional earnings achieved?
Basically, i'm not sure I understand how the target's share price and earnings are linked to the acquirer's cost of debt.
Thanks for any help.
Porro velit molestiae impedit repellat voluptatem quo. Nihil mollitia dolorem aut est nulla nam nobis. Neque et ex et saepe vel eos necessitatibus. Debitis adipisci distinctio mollitia qui rem consequatur aperiam ut. Cum beatae consequatur delectus facere cum quaerat.
Illum rerum consequatur unde sed molestiae. Numquam sit quisquam tempora blanditiis numquam provident. Qui est aut architecto assumenda qui dolor exercitationem. Sunt eius est odio fugit quia corrupti assumenda.
Atque excepturi libero voluptatem nulla quos alias aut. Rerum modi ipsam ratione in. Quia iste earum incidunt quo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...