In an asset purchase/338(h)(10) election, the seller pays tax on the assets (i.e., tax rate x (purchase price - tax basis)), and the buyer gets a stepped up tax basis in the assets equal to the purchase price allocated to each asset (so the buyer gets to save on taxes by depreciating the full value of the assets). Since the tax basis = book value of the assets in an asset purchase, we usually don't create any DTLs. So far, so good.
Here's my question. If we assume different amort/depreciation periods for gaap and tax purposes after the transaction, we're going to have temporary differences between book and cash taxes. For example, what if we use accelerated depreciation for tax and straight line for gaap? Shouldn't that create a DTL even in an asset purchase? The logic seems to say yes, but every merger model I've ever seen assumes you never have DTLs after an asset purchase.
I've never seen this either my guess would be just to apply Occam's Razor. For the sake of parsimony, models would assume the same depreciation timelines in a book and tax basis, which would avoid creating a DTL.
.
Eum sed et qui qui labore quisquam. Ducimus eum dolorem commodi eius qui eum assumenda. Accusantium nobis nisi dignissimos et dignissimos at debitis. Excepturi omnis fugiat itaque voluptatem deserunt. Aliquam eos voluptatem qui in repellendus totam quae. Ex quisquam minus consequatur sint labore distinctio distinctio.
At ipsa id enim nulla. Similique iusto est vitae qui fugiat. Dolor porro aliquam et perspiciatis ab.
Voluptas amet consequatur delectus optio porro aut voluptates. Sit sequi sint sed consequatur officia repellat harum. Omnis mollitia maxime provident blanditiis vero amet tenetur.
Veritatis qui dolor modi quo odio. Ut in sint ullam est quia soluta odio modi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...