Advice - Bad start in a new role (overthinking or genuine red flag)

Early 30s, 8 years experience across Big 4, investment banking, and a short buy-side stint. Until recently, my career trajectory felt solid.

A few months ago I joined a new advisory platform at a more senior level. On paper it was a step up. In practice, the transition has been rough.

I made a poor first impression early on (punctuality, responsiveness). That feedback was formally documented and knocked my confidence badly. Since then, I’ve fully corrected the basics and my work quality is solid - but naturally I'm in the doghouse and nothing more I can do apart from take it on the chin and improve. 

The bigger issue is under-utilisation. Dealflow is thin and the team has shrunk (we are talking 27-30 heads to now 8). A small number of live pitches exist, but work is being given to existing staff members and I’m largely doing BD or peripheral tasks, with limited ownership. That makes it hard to prove myself or change the narrative. (I've been told these are all legacy deals / deals that were in the existing pipeline). 

The culture is also very different from what I’m used to: highly political, face-time driven, and focused on optics. In prior roles I thrived in more structured, output-focused environments. As an analyst 2-3 in my last place, I could own a lot more whereas here they've got about 4-5 people staffed on a single deal. They're also still interviewing and looking to hire more which does not make any sense. 

I’m torn between:

  • fighting it out, rebuilding trust, and getting 1–2 deals done so I can leave on my terms
  • or protecting optionality, given the churn, ambiguity, and mental toll

I’ve had inbound interest for in-house / corp dev roles that would likely be a better fit, but I’m wary of moving again too soon. (My last role was a year). I don't think it's a capability issue given I was a banker for nearly 4 years and was top-rated in my previous place. I am absolutely terrified they're going to just turn around and fire me - I just keep on analysing everyone's reactions and they seem to just stare at me. 

Questions for those who’ve been there:

  1. Is this a normal rough start in a higher-pressure role, or a genuine red flag?
  2. How long does it realistically take to reset trust after a bad first impression?
  3. How do you tell the difference between temporary sidelining and being managed out?
  4. Is it better to grit it out for stability, or move sooner to a better-fit platform?

Looking for perspective - I've been warned the culture was pretty rough but I feel like I'm hanging on for dear life out here. 

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s how you can approach your situation:

1. Is this a normal rough start or a genuine red flag?

  • Red flags to consider:
    • The team shrinking from 27-30 to 8 is a significant indicator of instability. This suggests broader structural or business issues beyond your control.
    • Thin deal flow and under-utilization are concerning, especially if you’re not being given opportunities to prove yourself.
    • The culture being highly political and face-time driven, combined with the lack of ownership, is a mismatch for someone who thrives in structured, output-focused environments.
  • While rough starts are common, the combination of these factors leans more toward genuine red flags. The lack of deal flow and the team’s hiring decisions (despite shrinking) suggest mismanagement or unclear strategy.

2. How long does it take to reset trust after a bad first impression?

  • Resetting trust depends on the culture and leadership style of the firm. In political environments, optics often outweigh actual performance, making it harder to rebuild trust quickly.
  • You’ve already corrected the basics (punctuality, responsiveness), which is a good start. However, without meaningful work or ownership, it’s challenging to change the narrative.
  • In structured environments, trust can often be rebuilt within 6-12 months through consistent performance. In political environments, it may take longer and require navigating internal dynamics carefully.

3. How to differentiate between temporary sidelining and being managed out?

  • Temporary sidelining:
    • You’re still being staffed on meaningful tasks or deals, even if peripheral.
    • Feedback is constructive, and there’s a clear path to improvement.
  • Being managed out:
    • You’re excluded from key projects or pitches without explanation.
    • Feedback is vague, overly critical, or non-existent.
    • The team’s actions (e.g., hiring more people despite low deal flow) suggest they’re not invested in your success.
  • From your description, the lack of ownership and the team’s hiring decisions could indicate you’re being sidelined or deprioritized.

4. Should you grit it out or move sooner?

  • Grit it out if:
    • You see a realistic path to getting staffed on deals and rebuilding trust.
    • The firm’s broader instability (e.g., shrinking team, low deal flow) doesn’t pose a long-term risk to your career.
    • You believe staying will enhance your resume or open better exit opportunities.
  • Move sooner if:
    • The culture and environment are taking a significant mental toll.
    • You’re not being given opportunities to prove yourself, and the situation feels stagnant.
    • You have strong inbound interest for roles that align better with your skills and preferences.
  • Given the instability and cultural mismatch, moving to a better-fit platform may be the wiser choice. While another short stint isn’t ideal, it’s better than staying in a role that could damage your confidence and career trajectory further.

5. Actionable steps:

  • Short-term:
    • Focus on delivering high-quality work, even if it’s peripheral.
    • Build relationships with key stakeholders to improve your internal standing.
    • Document your contributions to demonstrate value if questioned.
  • Mid-term:
    • Explore the inbound corp dev opportunities discreetly. These roles may offer better stability and alignment with your strengths.
    • Assess whether staying another 6-12 months will significantly improve your resume or exit options.
  • Long-term:
    • Reflect on what you want from your career (e.g., culture, work-life balance, ownership) and prioritize roles that align with those values.

Final Thoughts:

You’re not alone—many professionals face similar challenges when transitioning to new roles or cultures. As highlighted in WSO threads, it’s crucial to protect your mental health and career trajectory. If the environment feels toxic or unsalvageable, don’t hesitate to prioritize a move to a better-fit role. Your prior track record and skills will speak for themselves.

Sources: How to deal with a recession career-wise? A few lessons learned during the previous GFC, From PE >> Startup >> Back to PE, Handling Stress / Burnout in Private Equity, Joined New Firm; Complete Non-Cultural Fit > Let Go in 6 Months, Is my start to new job normal? Paid to do nothing

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Et explicabo illo et officiis quam. Minima explicabo placeat eum iste odit. Assumenda et alias dolor aut voluptatem molestiae ea.

Dolorum alias qui in in consequatur. Sed deleniti non aut accusantium odit laboriosam nemo consectetur. Neque unde ducimus aut eius minus veritatis. Rem molestias esse velit esse aperiam quo optio. Aut eos nobis eos qui quos.

Ut molestiae aut nihil. In voluptates qui hic illo inventore. In totam harum distinctio nesciunt qui quis deleniti. Aspernatur cum minima id molestiae. Voluptatem eligendi eius consequuntur aliquid sequi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”