Amusing Coulter Screed on Wall Street

I'd actually planned to write about how surprised I was to see Bernanke re-appointed yesterday (I truly was - anyone who has read my TARP Guide knows I expected Larry Summers to be the next Fed chief), but then a buddy sent me this gem and I just couldn't pass it up.

Republican pin-up girl Ann Coulter fired a hilarious broadside at the Democrats and the Obama administration in her screed against Wall Street entitled, "Can We At Least Get a Toaster?" In the interest of full disclosure, I have to go on record as saying that I find Coulter to be an utterly distasteful harpy with the suspicious remnants of an Adam's apple, but that's just me. She is certainly not without her fans.

She reserves a special brand of vitriol (predictably) for Goldman Sachs, now that the firm's name has become synonymous with evil in the American psyche. Unfortunately, she has a point when she illustrates four lesser-known instances of government bailouts of the banks on questionable foreign bonds over the past 15 years. And I have to admit that I got a kick out of her dig at Corzine:

As Schweizer demonstrates, whenever the Democrats "regulate" Wall Street, the innocent pay through the nose, while Wall Street swine lower than drug dealers and pornographers end up with multimillion-dollar bonuses so they can run for governor of New Jersey and fund lavish Democratic fundraisers in the Hamptons.

Wall Street swine lower than drug dealers and pornographers...that's kinda got a nice ring to it, too. She's nothing if not entertaining. And a lot of banks make this too easy for talking heads like Coulter. Washington Mutual threw this meatball into her wheelhouse:

Before you knew it, once-respectable Wall Street institutions were buying investment products even more ludicrous than Mexican bonds: They were buying the mortgages of Mexican strawberry-pickers.

With nothing to fear, the big financial houses bought, repackaged and resold investment products that included loans like the one issued by Washington Mutual to non-English-speaking strawberry pickers earning a combined $14,000 a year to purchase a $720,000 house.

So, fellow swine lower than drug dealers and pornographers, one question remains. As disagreeable as Coulter is, would you still hit it?

5 Comments
 
Best Response

hmmm...i'm not a huge fan of the column this week (I do have anncoulter.com bookmarked) but thats because of my admittedly huge bias in favor of Wall Street. Like usual Ann tells the facts but spins it to her way by characterizing the Wall Street people as lowlifes (most of the CEOs are Democrats). And she does bring up some good points about how the government continues to support the mistakes of the large firms, and in fact is made up of people from said firms (Corzine, Geithner, Summers, Paulson, etc.) I'm not into that whole Glenn Beck-Goldman Sachs-novus ordo seclorum stuff going on, but its always interesting how the Republican party is seen as the party of Wall street while the Dems save WS from all its fuck ups. WS is fine with being "free-market capitalists"...until that is the free market bites them in the ass- thats where the Dems come in. She brings up a good point at showing all of the ludicrous bailouts that have taken place over the years, from LTCM to TARP. (BTW if you can't see my bias I love Ann Coulter but I would not hit it...even though she is more attractive in person than on TV)

Reality hits you hard, bro...
 

Asperiores voluptas ea aut quia. Aliquam tenetur ullam voluptatibus ratione eveniet. Culpa in quia non exercitationem. Porro ut fugit perferendis ut natus. Non nemo commodi ut.

Sed est delectus deleniti nemo voluptatem. Nostrum omnis consequatur architecto quia. Voluptatum eligendi expedita optio sunt omnis ipsa. Eum voluptatem et reprehenderit ipsum. Modi impedit aliquam velit. Facilis dolores necessitatibus et reiciendis.

Sed in molestias reiciendis sunt. Voluptatibus nobis qui quis dignissimos voluptates et dolorem quod. Voluptatem praesentium neque provident eaque sunt quasi. Qui tempore cum fugit consequatur animi itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”