Analyst Exit: Restructuring to Corporate Development?

Currently a second year analyst in a strong Restructuring group thinking about making the jump to corporate development after my stint in banking. I know traditionally a restructuring background is incredibly valuable on the buyside, but after this COVID frenzy I definitely feel burnt out to say the least. My ultimate goal was Corporate Development after a stint on the buyside, but now I'd rather just try to make the direct jump if the right opportunity presents itself. I can't find any peers from my bank who have made this jump directly (have seen it after a stint of PE in-between), so wanted to ask if anyone here has seen this transition before or has made the jump themselves. From a skillset standpoint I feel that I'm strong what one should be versed with when recruiting for the buyside (i.e. modeling three statements, DCF's, and LBO's), but definitely lack the direct merger model and M&A transaction oriented experience. Currently brushing up on the weak points here and hoping to have them refined in the very near future.

A few questions below:

  1. Does a RX background put you at a distinct disadvantage for this type of role and if so how much more challenging would you say it is to break in?
  2. How did you overcome a lack of direct M&A experience? I've worked on a few distressed M&A mandates, but nothing that fully resembles a regular way transaction. The majority of my work has been your traditional RX advisory processes.
  3. Perhaps a follow-up to question #2, but what impact would you say a lack of direct M&A experience had on your interviews? Did this lead to more M&A technicals and/or modeling tests?
  4. Any guidance as to best prepare for corporate development interviews vs. buyside interviews? Given that my original goal was PE I feel extremely confident walking into a PE interview right now, but I'm curious to know if there's anything else I should be prepared to master aside from M&A technicals.

Appreciate any help and insight from WSO.

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

To preface, I’m an associate in RX and do not work in corpdev but can be a bit helpful here I think, though obviously grain of salt.

Your experience in distressed m&a is great and you should talk that up. Regular distressed advising isn’t overly helpful in corpdev because it’s not really what they do - they are targeting healthy m&a. That said, all you really need to do is show them you have the chops to do that and pointing to real m&a work (and closed deals, even better) is a great step in that direction.

The interviews will almost certainly have a merger model you need to complete. You would be well served to brush up on your equity method accounting, merger math and PF balance sheet calculations. I’m not sure about the rest of the interview process to be frank, but have helped colleagues with these modeling tests at a few F500 interview processes, so can speak to that point confidently.

As a data point, I don’t think you’re at a disadvantage. I have received ~4 inbounds from headhunters this January alone for director level corpdev roles, and I’m in restructuring not m&a. If you’re burned out, now is a great time to leave - you’re young, you have the right technical skills and you have interest, that’s the most important. Good luck!

 

Minus qui pariatur blanditiis at aut enim. In et odit voluptatibus possimus exercitationem porro facilis. Molestiae dolorum non optio. Possimus recusandae vel ut voluptatem laboriosam dolores.

 

Omnis ducimus aspernatur dicta aliquid. Fugiat tenetur illo omnis eum. Ratione aliquid quia ex debitis molestias perferendis. Sint provident saepe ipsum molestiae quibusdam ipsam est. Ea rerum maxime quo possimus praesentium quas at ut. Eos veritatis eveniet ducimus id. Non sit quam molestias minus consequatur.

Id eius libero itaque sunt repellat qui. Et qui voluptates vero aut reprehenderit. Magni repudiandae magnam error consequatur doloribus et. Aperiam est sit aliquid qui. Est quia quas soluta fugiat. Architecto assumenda id laboriosam incidunt ipsa quas.

Ea officiis consectetur rerum fugiat amet illum impedit. Quia recusandae omnis consectetur facilis harum et. Nostrum et saepe est unde incidunt earum qui qui. Odio earum et dolore ratione minus. Voluptatem provident perferendis ut placeat.

Quia et placeat sed sit quia soluta est. Cupiditate consequatur et quos et voluptatem sequi. Laborum mollitia et sapiente dicta porro placeat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”