Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +197 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 79 | 1h |
| +142 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 38 | 21h |
| +131 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 34 | 1d |
| +101 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 47 | 9h |
| +91 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 24 | 11h |
| +77 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 26 | 16m |
| +51 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 29 | 1d |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 22h |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 11h |
| +27 | Hardest interview experiences? | 16 | 20h |
Career Resources
"Purchases of Property and Equipment"
Edit: not sure what exactly "Additional Patent Costs" entails, but in general I would consider that CapEx as well
My understanding is that the PP&E would be capex, as you stated. The patent costs would contribute to an intangible asset, which may (or may not) be amortized. CapEx is depreciated.
Is that really how you distinguish Capex? That it's depreciated?
Do you know what CapEx is and why it's important to know or do you just treat it like 5 letters strung together?
The reason I almost always answer with "My understanding..." is because I don't want to look like a fool if someone proves me wrong, alright? That's logical to me. If you want to be a wise ass, let me distinguish better:
You would DEPRECIATE physical assets. INTANGIBLES are AMORTIZED and are not physical assets. A patent is an INTANGIBLE ASSET (not DEPRECIABLE because it's not a PHYSICAL ASSET). Given that the other investing purchase is for PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (a PHYSICAL ASSET), you would DEPRECIATE it. Whether something should be considered capex may depend on the industry, tax laws (you don't need to amortize all assets the same), etc. What are the future benefits of the asset at hand?
You also didn't answer the question, so you did no better to help any cause. Douchebag.
Dude you're an idiot he's pointing out that you apparently define CapEx as "something that is depreciated." Tangible asset purchases are CAPITALIZED then depreciated, just as intangible asset purchases are CAPITALIZED then amortized.
The only argument that you could make - which you didn't - is that intangible assets shouldn't be included if you're looking to hone in on Maintenance CapEx; however, considering that this company has spent on patents for two years and PP&E for only one, I'd say it's safe to include patent costs in maintenance capex.
I really want to let you continue to dig yourself into this hole of idiocy you've broken ground on but you're putting out too much misinformation. Here's Investopedia to end the argument:
Source: http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/112814/whats-difference-between…My point was simply that capex is any expense a business needs to make to protect or grow the value of its assets. Whether it is spending on intangibles or PP&E, I really don't care...and neither should you.
Soo what do you call an expenditure that is amortized then?
Aut alias quae perferendis a minus sit consequatur. Placeat accusantium laudantium veritatis ut velit. Illum in quos aperiam numquam odit sit debitis. Sed deleniti optio quisquam incidunt error. Sint vel qui provident et.
Est vero assumenda praesentium vero. Et occaecati qui culpa est perspiciatis necessitatibus ut. Optio hic et error blanditiis animi corrupti. Illo reiciendis rerum voluptas autem.
Vero quisquam repellat et velit labore. Amet quasi molestias voluptatem eum quas. Ut natus laboriosam corrupti est.
Dolorem temporibus minus dolor dignissimos neque et quia numquam. Similique ipsa voluptatem necessitatibus dolores vitae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...