Banking Senior Fired After AI Tracks Down his Identity

In an only in 2025 story, heard there’s a rumor going around that a senior banker at a bulge bracket (unsure exact level) was let go for anonymously posting about his firm online. A friend in IT said they traced it back by analyzing email patterns such as tone, typos, writing style and were able to match it with high enough confidence to take action.

25 Comments
 

Have they slowed down? The same few posters and commentators are still posting a lot about UBS. Has to be a different firm, surely. Also, I think that none of the UBS posters are currently at UBS. They are way too open about hating the firm, and all seem salty about the firm suggesting they got laid off. Either that or they are all in UBS TMT and have no other place to vent.

 
Most Helpful

They had to be suspicious of him or something. I would think it’d be hard for IT to constantly monitor all emails and online forums to overlay text patterns.


They would have needed to seen a post and suspected it could have been a few people then did the analysis or something.


Sounds v big brother, but I wonder what he said to have gotten fired.

 

sup dawg yo fuq this firm's culture; seniors be gossipin; sheet cant stay another day in this wack environment. keep bussin [insert] 2015 dap

 

Nice attempt to censor comments here. Shareholders and regulators will be deeply concerned if it is proven that bank’s capital is being used to witch hunt. 

 

Yeah especially when you have like accounts like over complementing each other, you know it’s the same guy. 
No one glazes over people responding they are often more like “umm ok cool” to responses vs “wow these are fantastic responses you have such great insights”

 

Pretty sure the UBS posters are all communicating with each other. Their commentary is always the same, even when writing styles are different. It sucks to be an incoming analyst at UBS because this forum makes it hard to be excited about starting. The comments on WSO make it feel like it's all over before it started, based on what offer I took back in sophomore year. 

 

So negative UBS posts one of two things..

Theory 1: everyone is communicating with each other to artificially make UBs look bad when it’s a fantastic place to work, or

Theory 2: League tables are correct and articles citing all the departures and declines are accurate

 

lol you might think you do but you don’t. The style is the same the specific give aways are the same. At work you just type a lot more formally than than not at work. But there is a reason throughout history people have been able to identify writings based off writing style and also why teachers can recognise when students haven’t written something themselves if they have taught them long enough 

 

Just put it in Ai and say to write in the tone of an angry just fired MD who is trying to lecture an analyst, but the MD isn’t a great banker and doesn’t close any deals

 

Iste voluptas error ducimus voluptate minima dolorem non quis. Molestiae omnis quidem non itaque. Minima est ipsum nihil consequatur. Reiciendis cumque velit veniam voluptatem nulla omnis laudantium.

Ipsa id eveniet mollitia quasi. Eum velit fugiat hic nisi reprehenderit. Sint consequuntur aspernatur fugit ratione repellat. In quidem voluptas dolorem quis quia qui quia. Possimus non est cum fuga.

Non cum quas temporibus aut. Quia quibusdam dolore quia fugit placeat nesciunt quo. Aliquam voluptas placeat beatae aspernatur beatae nobis. Et corrupti exercitationem soluta iure in omnis provident autem. Necessitatibus itaque voluptatem labore dolor sint.

Rem corrupti nisi ea. Voluptatem beatae expedita recusandae harum quia nam.

 

Vel eaque perferendis saepe sunt consectetur. Eum laudantium autem et non. Numquam qui sit quidem aspernatur cupiditate optio. Sunt officiis voluptatem est quia non ut. Possimus quas ut quasi officia quia. Praesentium est voluptates neque molestiae.

Mollitia ut quia sed ea est. Perspiciatis non quidem quasi similique voluptatem ea officiis dolorem. Nam rerum ex placeat consequatur qui id repellendus.

Est neque molestiae animi autem libero voluptatem quia. Quis eos labore qui nobis in officia debitis consequatur. Repellat nihil qui odit et sit earum. Molestiae quis aut illum expedita quia omnis. Et at ut et dolorem voluptas animi autem qui.

Qui quia nihil ullam. Consequatur sunt eos et dicta non fugit delectus maiores. Sapiente eius magnam quia ipsam facilis quo laboriosam.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”