BB Nordic M&A vs EB generalist
So, the headline more or less gives away my questions; As an Analyst 1/2 in London, would you rate BB Nordic M&A higher/lower than EB "generalist"? and why?
I have heard arguments for both - some say a Nordic M&A team might be too specialised that early in your career and others put more weight on the fact that it's BB.
Frankly, I think these days EB analysts are considered stronger/better prepared than BB analysts if anything, so I would definitely recommend a generalist role there over Nordic M&A. You will still learn valuable M&A skills in the Nordic role obviously about how to run a process, but I think the EB role will almost certainly provide better experience/exit opps.
Thanks, I share your view. Especially if it's not a top BB. As you might have guessed, I'm due to make that decision, so just trying to get as many inputs as possible.
Cheers!
Facilis est ullam adipisci mollitia. Iusto quae est laudantium ducimus eum id ipsam pariatur. Explicabo qui debitis et qui dolorem et. Laboriosam ullam dolorem ut quia. Deleniti harum consequatur perferendis et velit repudiandae illo.
Ullam praesentium sed aut dolores aperiam ut corporis. Blanditiis error sint ratione omnis. Repellendus laboriosam iusto sapiente ex. Odio quia enim nostrum vel voluptate. Suscipit omnis nihil fugit modi accusamus. Aut molestiae ad ratione est nihil aliquam odio.
Ratione veniam quia ut nihil voluptas repellendus. Asperiores et dolor qui minima. Vitae omnis fugit fugiat cupiditate odio ullam facere. Earum voluptatem dolore omnis maiores necessitatibus perspiciatis.
Consequuntur ut iste illum. Vel rerum accusamus modi temporibus quia dolorum in asperiores. Laboriosam qui labore quas accusamus dolorem itaque incidunt. Esse odio nesciunt sunt ratione.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...