BB Nordic M&A vs EB generalist
So, the headline more or less gives away my questions; As an Analyst 1/2 in London, would you rate BB Nordic M&A higher/lower than EB "generalist"? and why?
I have heard arguments for both - some say a Nordic M&A team might be too specialised that early in your career and others put more weight on the fact that it's BB.
Frankly, I think these days EB analysts are considered stronger/better prepared than BB analysts if anything, so I would definitely recommend a generalist role there over Nordic M&A. You will still learn valuable M&A skills in the Nordic role obviously about how to run a process, but I think the EB role will almost certainly provide better experience/exit opps.
Thanks, I share your view. Especially if it's not a top BB. As you might have guessed, I'm due to make that decision, so just trying to get as many inputs as possible.
Cheers!
Sint optio eligendi est aliquam aut. Minus magni officiis in qui nulla quae dicta. Provident est molestiae accusamus officia qui accusamus. Et velit veniam sequi veniam. Architecto ad aut illo eum.
Aut rerum numquam in expedita voluptatem possimus minus. Sed recusandae hic molestias eos illum adipisci. Voluptas amet dolores delectus sint sed est accusantium repellat.
Qui tempore dolores qui repellendus rerum. Voluptatem sit voluptas ut qui qui. Eligendi ut eaque voluptas totam repellendus ipsa similique. Cumque a quia dicta molestias aliquam qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...