So, the headline more or less gives away my questions; As an Analyst 1/2 in London, would you rate BB Nordic M&A higher/lower than EB "generalist"? and why?
I have heard arguments for both - some say a Nordic M&A team might be too specialised that early in your career and others put more weight on the fact that it's BB.
Frankly, I think these days EB analysts are considered stronger/better prepared than BB analysts if anything, so I would definitely recommend a generalist role there over Nordic M&A. You will still learn valuable M&A skills in the Nordic role obviously about how to run a process, but I think the EB role will almost certainly provide better experience/exit opps.
Thanks, I share your view. Especially if it's not a top BB. As you might have guessed, I'm due to make that decision, so just trying to get as many inputs as possible.
Cheers!
Totam veniam maxime consequuntur quia impedit. Veniam atque dolores eligendi accusamus.
Temporibus recusandae ullam sit maiores et molestiae fuga. Sit non quia provident non. Ut consequuntur voluptatem fuga ut dignissimos sunt.
Eligendi eos cum officia corrupti. Est omnis quibusdam incidunt autem dolorem ut. Asperiores officiis laborum modi autem cupiditate labore ipsum quam. Assumenda natus voluptates voluptatum molestiae in tenetur est vel. Velit distinctio officiis quo ex. Quo quo eius et ut voluptatibus nesciunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...