BB SF vs. MM NYC
Goal is investor role in NYC.
Deciding between BB (Barclays/CS/Citi) in SF and MM (Stifel/Cowen/Oppenheimer) in NYC.
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +439 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 40 | 10h |
| +327 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 41 | 4d |
| +186 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 53 | 12h |
| +64 | When to Leave Office as Intern | 8 | 6d |
| +56 | F*ck it I'm Going to Med School | 19 | 1d |
| +40 | Living in greenwich as an analyst? | 8 | 9h |
| +39 | Would you rather be a Touse Squid or a Bouse Mogger in IB | 2 | 5d |
| +39 | Getting Laid in IB? | 20 | 4h |
| +32 | STEM student lost in London IB recruiting | 18 | 15h |
| +27 | NYC Associate Budget | 9 | 7h |
Career Resources
I assume you are going into tech and want to go buyside tech. I wouldn't call any of these MM firms anywhere near top-tier MM in tech (or really any industry). I would choose one of the BBs, you will be way more competitive for buy-side recruiting even without being in NY.
How do people recruit from SF for NYC buy-side?
This is a no brainer. Please go BB over these MM especially for tech. SF is better than it’s rep, I’m in one of the BB groups you mentioned. Come off private if you have questions ill PM
Nolan42
Bump
Sunt eos alias cumque omnis sapiente. Consectetur sint sed necessitatibus aliquam temporibus voluptatibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...