19 Comments
 
Most Helpful

That’s because the change is driven by some new/revised tax code where ordering from home is no longer the same as ordering from the office. I’m not saying that the banks don’t want junior people back in the office asap, but the biggest driver for this change is the tax change, not an effort to ruin WFH… but some people aren’t ready to hear that.

 

Do they really expect me to believe that spending $35 to have a meal delivered to the office (including tip, service fee, restaurant fee, etc.) saves them money over me walking to Chipotle or Sweet Green and spending $18 max? And the late night snack change is completely ridiculous. We HAVE to order through GrubHub and can't even get food from the market?? To me it seems like this was done to get people back into the office and benefit GrubHub and their workers. I'm pretty sure the tax implications are being used as a coverup.

 

Yea I don’t understand the late night snack rule the most. Taking away the 4th floor snacks seems pointless to me, if the goal is to get people back in the office. Used to look forward to getting some solid food, now I’ll be lucky to afford a bag of chips after delivery fees etc. Must have to do with the audit/tax rules, as someone above said

 

Yeah plus Grubhub always charges more than other delivery services (DoorDash and UberEats). So much in fees even after paying for premium. If BofA really wanted the best for its employees, they should have gone with DoorDash which cuts fees if you have the premium plan. Guess DoorDash not choosing BofA for their IPO rubbed them the wrong way

 

Repellendus quas aperiam explicabo vel atque voluptates alias possimus. Esse itaque ut reiciendis incidunt.

Alias doloribus dignissimos in dignissimos est culpa est. Facere vel reiciendis repellat consectetur delectus ea ut. Nihil saepe animi fugit possimus similique. Ratione ea eveniet in et beatae ratione nemo ratione. Dolores accusantium ut ratione temporibus. Fugiat fugiat deleniti enim quod maiores laborum numquam ex. Laboriosam sed fuga perspiciatis sequi rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”