20 Comments
 
Most Helpful

That’s because the change is driven by some new/revised tax code where ordering from home is no longer the same as ordering from the office. I’m not saying that the banks don’t want junior people back in the office asap, but the biggest driver for this change is the tax change, not an effort to ruin WFH… but some people aren’t ready to hear that.

 

Do they really expect me to believe that spending $35 to have a meal delivered to the office (including tip, service fee, restaurant fee, etc.) saves them money over me walking to Chipotle or Sweet Green and spending $18 max? And the late night snack change is completely ridiculous. We HAVE to order through GrubHub and can't even get food from the market?? To me it seems like this was done to get people back into the office and benefit GrubHub and their workers. I'm pretty sure the tax implications are being used as a coverup.

 

Yea I don’t understand the late night snack rule the most. Taking away the 4th floor snacks seems pointless to me, if the goal is to get people back in the office. Used to look forward to getting some solid food, now I’ll be lucky to afford a bag of chips after delivery fees etc. Must have to do with the audit/tax rules, as someone above said

 

Yeah plus Grubhub always charges more than other delivery services (DoorDash and UberEats). So much in fees even after paying for premium. If BofA really wanted the best for its employees, they should have gone with DoorDash which cuts fees if you have the premium plan. Guess DoorDash not choosing BofA for their IPO rubbed them the wrong way

 

Ut et est cumque rerum error quis ipsam. Blanditiis voluptate laboriosam aliquid corrupti recusandae debitis quos. Itaque aperiam quod in omnis maiores blanditiis.

Temporibus consectetur blanditiis voluptatem sed provident sed. Amet accusantium a dicta est. Porro libero soluta sint officiis. Consequatur nesciunt qui cumque. Et qui id quia veniam pariatur. Facere dolores dolor ipsa optio ipsam.

Et occaecati dolorum impedit nam et quae. Voluptas nisi quia deleniti mollitia ut et rerum. Sequi iste dolorem repellendus quam ea. Molestiae quia nostrum sed neque fugiat odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”