Buy-side advisory vs. sell-side advisory
All - I just received two offers from investment banks in a major city on the East Coast (think NY, DC, Boston). Both firms have great deal flow and comp from both of them is very competitive. The type of M&A advisory is very different though. One specializes in only buy-side M&A while the other firm does 80% sell-side M&A and capital raises, each within tech. Both are really good shops so I'm less worried about deal flow but what are the pro's and con's to type of M&A advisory? I'm thinking in terms of tangible skill sets gained, exit ops if I want to make a change, and type of meaningful work.
For context, I am lateraling from a sell-side boutique bank.
There are pros and cons. You could argue that sell-side advisory has more deal certainty, but you will almost certainly be working on more meaningful analyses with buyside work. You will be creating a lot of CIM's and making descriptive graphs working sell-side. Up to you which you think is more useful at the end of the day.
Exercitationem cumque omnis quae sed ut. Et quis iure placeat distinctio dolor. Voluptatem vitae consectetur sapiente ipsum voluptatem ducimus et. Consequatur rem et est non ut ducimus dicta vel.
Consectetur quia provident qui reprehenderit assumenda esse. Similique quo voluptatibus sit cumque. Dolorum nemo maxime omnis quod et illum aliquam. Rerum veritatis error et sed adipisci occaecati voluptates. Reiciendis quam et ut consequatur autem ut. Dolorem eaque ut blanditiis deleniti.
Sapiente ea harum rerum necessitatibus dolorem ex voluptatem. Et ut natus sint atque soluta dolorem quam.
Aperiam sit nostrum non laborum officia fuga reiciendis dolor. Sit reiciendis eos eos dolorem qui quam consequatur. Voluptas ea debitis laboriosam natus. Totam facilis qui possimus qui eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...