Got both offers for 2023 Summer Analyst Investment Banking. CVP pays a lot more but seems too good to be true. I see people leaving and going to PE and taking a pay cut. If I chose MS I would try to go to a Mega Fund PE.
Would PE pay more in the long-run (all in) than CVP? Is it a marginal difference where I should take MS for the brand name and prestige? Any advice helps!
Thanks
| +380 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 37 | 6h |
| +327 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 41 | 1d |
| +133 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 46 | 1h |
| +61 | When to Leave Office as Intern | 8 | 4d |
| +55 | Best IB Group Overall? | 32 | 12h |
| +54 | F*ck it I'm Going to Med School | 19 | 1h |
| +39 | Would you rather be a Touse Squid or a Bouse Mogger in IB | 2 | 4d |
| +33 | What do you say to ppl who don’t know EVR/LAZ/CVP/PJT | 28 | 1d |
| +31 | STEM student lost in London IB recruiting | 17 | 2d |
| +27 | [HELP REQUESTED]: Take A2A Promo or Go Corp Dev | 9 | 19h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Depends what group at MS. If M&A, I'd probably do that instead of CVP since the analyst program is 2 years instead of 3 and PE exits are pretty comparable.
Do you know about the financial sponsor's group placement into PE? Do they go to MF firms? I have heard that the culture and work-life balance is great in this group.
I think sponsors at ms is a top group, but not 100% sure
Thanks for the advice! unfortunately I do not know what group I will get placed into because there is a group placement process and I assume majority of interns gun for the M&A group lol
Comprable exits? I'd assume MS M&A places lights out better than CVP
In a similar position, what about FSG as OP said? Or GPUG/Media Communications?
Ms if you want to exit hands down
MS if M&A, CVP otherwise
What about FSG or Media Communications?
nah
Unless you are going to be in MS m&a or Menlo tech, CVP has the same, if not better exits on a per capita basis, and you will get paid more.
What about media comms? Have some alumni in it
Media/Comms also has historically great placements to my knowledge.
Do you know about the financial sponsor's group placement into PE? Do they go to MF firms? I have heard that the culture and work-life balance is great in this group.
Sponsors is great and places near the top for MF PE. However, MS group placement can be a crapshoot, and most lists M&C, M&A, and sponsors as their top 3 choices, so it is far from guaranteed that you get into one of those groups, unless you have an in with someone who has a say. Most groups at MS will have at least some MF PE placement and it is rare to be placed into a group with objectively bad PE placement, but overall, CVP will be more consistent on a per capita basis, and better if you don't place into a top group.
Any insight on MS Tech?
NY Tech is very IPO-centric (insane deal flow), not as much M&A
I've heard they still have great exits - do you have any insight on that?
Go MS if you wanna exit MF PE
Former Centerview analyst here, exited to MF PE. Both good options — if you wanna exit to PE as fast as possible, go MS (bc of the 3-year program at CVP) otherwise CVP takes the cake in all other respects (compensation, WLB, experience) with exits on par with MS, or better depending on group placement.
what cvp office? Is it PA or SF?
MS will give you a faster and better exit, easy choice here
.
What about CVP vs MS for an OC ?
Voluptatem voluptatum impedit quae error odio cum. Ea amet est vitae velit qui neque ducimus. Modi quod aut voluptatem quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Nulla praesentium magni beatae qui. Corrupti aut sit unde et aspernatur ut.
Tempore sequi ea impedit aut sed. Cupiditate quis aut amet error non perspiciatis. Optio autem nam vero officiis quaerat quo vel omnis. Sunt beatae impedit laborum animi aut. Veniam dolores eius molestiae quis dolorem facilis quae est. Architecto nisi quis quasi est laborum quas similique.
Similique eum ipsa nisi. Ut tenetur maiores laboriosam optio eos esse. Facere est dolor non qui est. Non libero laboriosam facere modi magnam voluptatem at. Voluptatibus qui quis et magni quia illo saepe voluptatibus. Necessitatibus sequi laudantium libero sint. Dolorum eveniet possimus ut incidunt et ipsam.