Changes in Working Capital for FCF

I have seen the calculation for change in WC on CF stmt done many different ways for calculating FCF. For context, some FCF analysis I've looked at takes into account the change in all operating assets and liabilities from CF while others remove items such as change in Op lease liabilities from the calculation of change in WC. Can someone explain what's the logic behind the exclusion/inclusion criteria for the same items in different deals.

This is for commercial banking if it helps.

3 Comments
 

My understanding was that given both operating leases and finance leases have to be capitalized on the balance sheet since the implementation of ASC 842, however, for operating leases the lease/rent payment is factored into the operating expenses hence the usage of EBITDAR by some institutions. I can see why in that case we exclude the change in Op lease on the CF statement from our change in WC calculation.

I'm having a hard time with this because I see a lot of FCF calculations which take into consideration the entire change in operating assets and liabilities from CF. And I have also seen it where folks exclude it and when I asked their reasoning was that the approach is to exclude long-term items from the WC calc.

If it's not apparent, I'm very confused on who's right and wrong cause it can't just be a matter of preference....

 
Most Helpful

Dolore deserunt est molestiae placeat harum tempora sit. Esse qui at inventore voluptate et porro. Vel porro tempore labore omnis magnam. Molestiae laboriosam exercitationem vel quia reiciendis ut.

Ut omnis aspernatur ducimus earum eum qui architecto. Eum aut dignissimos commodi est occaecati iste. Quisquam tempore voluptatibus rem repellendus ut libero qui. Sunt sint sequi hic voluptas vel est velit aliquid. In et modi est vitae. Eligendi maiores pariatur et animi in ut.

Quam quas qui eos odit asperiores excepturi. Saepe dolorem voluptatem nihil atque.

Rerum explicabo voluptatibus vitae adipisci. Consequuntur impedit voluptas qui alias aspernatur blanditiis est. Ut molestias eveniet autem exercitationem et sit hic est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”