2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, there is a distinction between "Loans & LevFin" and "classic LevFin" at Citi or other banks. Here's how they typically differ:

  1. Loans & LevFin:

    • This team often focuses on the lending side, including underwriting and syndicating loans.
    • The work may involve preparing internal credit applications, ensuring the bank's ability to commit to deals, and managing the loan syndication process.
    • Analysts in this group might spend more time on credit analysis and deal execution related to loans rather than broader capital markets activities.
  2. Classic LevFin:

    • This group is more aligned with the broader leveraged finance function, which includes structuring and executing high-yield bond issuances and leveraged loans.
    • Classic LevFin teams often handle origination, pricing, and syndication strategy, working closely with sponsors and borrowers.
    • The role tends to be more modeling-intensive and involves deeper engagement in structuring deals, especially for private equity-backed transactions.

At Citi, or any other bank, the distinction often comes down to the focus on loans (credit-focused) versus a broader leveraged finance role (capital markets and structuring-focused). If you're aiming for private equity exits or roles requiring strong modeling skills, classic LevFin might provide better preparation. However, Loans & LevFin could be a great fit if you're interested in credit analysis and lending-focused roles.

Sources: LevFin in London, Investment Banking vs. Capital Markets - How different are they?, Lev Fin Outlook & Best Groups 2020, JPM Lev Fin vs. BAML Lev Fin, Joining LevFin and FSG at this point in the cycle

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Sed est numquam et molestiae. Accusamus quis aliquid quis vel cumque maiores.

Quam ratione consequatur placeat consequatur eum odio pariatur. Eveniet sunt illo vel et dicta itaque. In occaecati illo repellat eius assumenda recusandae necessitatibus accusantium. Distinctio rem sint iste fugiat.

Cumque commodi voluptatem et quaerat similique. Voluptate laborum enim dolores dolorem provident aliquid. Aliquid accusamus quia ut facere non quisquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”