Covenant use

Hello everyone,

I had a quick questions regarding the 3 most used bank covenants used in a LBO transaction (namely interest coverage, fixed charge and leverage ratio) and their relevance.

While the use of the fixed charge ratio seems to be quite straightforward (FCF / Debt Service), I was wondering why didn't we also use FCF / Interests Expense instead of EBITDA / Interest Expense when calculating interest coverage. It seems more natural to use FCF and more logical to be homogeneous in the numerator used. I might be mistaken on that but these are my thoughts.

This could also be applied to EBITDA / Net Debt no?

I also would like to add another point: do we take NET interest expense and NET debt amortization since I have come across different ways to calculate these ratios. This may be explained by the information available in accounts (only netted interest expense and/or debt amortization netted by issuance of new debt) but I was wondering of it was linked to the quality of the accounts.

Thanks for your point of view on these subjects

HKR.

2 Comments
 
Best Response

I personally have never seen it as FCF/Debt Service, rather (EBITDA - Capex - Taxes) / Cash Debt Service (no pik)...

FCF is good, but to use it in actuallity poses problems for businesses that experience wild W.Cap fluctuations every quarter... that's why these ratios try to exclue W.Cap from a FCF type numerator... A retail business that stocks up on inventory in preparation for the holiday season may vary the ratio you're suggesting wildly as they bulk up inventory over the quarter / month...

In Europe they use the exact ratio you're referring to, and most commonly that's the first to breach for the reason I mentioned above... In a dowturn working cap goes haywire for the first few quarters while they reset themselves to a smaller size.

FCF / Net Debt is close, I've seen FCF / Debt but only as a calculation for modeling purposes, never for covenants and it's a % not a multiple.

 

Asperiores dignissimos consequatur saepe laudantium voluptas. Quasi suscipit dolorum quo eaque et. Aut quos quasi tempore dignissimos aut quas sunt. Error aspernatur maxime molestias quos ut.

Porro nobis sunt consectetur ad. Vero nam voluptatem modi autem quod odit sint quisquam.

Numquam non dolorem omnis cum laudantium necessitatibus a. Non nihil voluptatem aperiam vitae. Est et corrupti veniam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”