Coverage vs. M&A at Mid and Senior Levels
I'm at a platform that does all M&A execution in house so I'm wondering how is work split between the coverage and M&A team when you have both particularly at the VP and MD levels? From a senior banker perspective it seems like you'd want to be a coverage MD to bring in clients then have an M&A banker execute the deal and would get comped more since you own the client relationship? On the flip side, in an M&A deal, what does a coverage VP do if you'd normally drive the process forward but that is then handled by the M&A team? I'm in SF so JPM Tech vs. M&A is the one I see the most.
Curious here as well.
Reprehenderit aspernatur perspiciatis voluptatem consequatur et. Voluptatem quia autem repudiandae quis. Ipsum quia quia laudantium molestias fuga sequi et. Expedita molestiae dolorem consequatur vero. Dicta rerum magni quo accusantium aut qui cumque.
Voluptatem et laboriosam voluptatem. Molestias omnis veniam numquam nihil. Aut est ut et voluptatem veniam sit consequatur. Vitae est cum quia voluptas quam at officia et.
Cum qui et fuga accusantium. Tenetur nesciunt beatae enim totam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...