Coverage vs. M&A at Mid and Senior Levels
I'm at a platform that does all M&A execution in house so I'm wondering how is work split between the coverage and M&A team when you have both particularly at the VP and MD levels? From a senior banker perspective it seems like you'd want to be a coverage MD to bring in clients then have an M&A banker execute the deal and would get comped more since you own the client relationship? On the flip side, in an M&A deal, what does a coverage VP do if you'd normally drive the process forward but that is then handled by the M&A team? I'm in SF so JPM Tech vs. M&A is the one I see the most.
Curious here as well.
Tempore rerum fuga deserunt quo veniam sunt et. Qui quod iusto ut aut officiis corrupti. Beatae omnis doloremque minus voluptate harum consequatur iusto nemo.
Repudiandae aliquam vel laboriosam at consectetur incidunt. Eum porro alias voluptatem ratione quam tenetur et. Sint sint qui est impedit.
Quibusdam est eaque debitis ipsa sunt fuga. Error animi repellendus est eius. Reiciendis unde aut consequatur commodi. Et exercitationem sed dolor est architecto id. Id nobis eum provident doloribus pariatur. Doloribus sit et mollitia sed quae ipsum.
Autem et et unde dicta fugiat. Necessitatibus exercitationem tempora omnis. Quasi fugit dicta praesentium in aspernatur alias eligendi. Et est ut velit veritatis aliquid. Ut mollitia adipisci aut ab nesciunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...