Coverage vs. M&A at Mid and Senior Levels
I'm at a platform that does all M&A execution in house so I'm wondering how is work split between the coverage and M&A team when you have both particularly at the VP and MD levels? From a senior banker perspective it seems like you'd want to be a coverage MD to bring in clients then have an M&A banker execute the deal and would get comped more since you own the client relationship? On the flip side, in an M&A deal, what does a coverage VP do if you'd normally drive the process forward but that is then handled by the M&A team? I'm in SF so JPM Tech vs. M&A is the one I see the most.
Curious here as well.
Ut consectetur reprehenderit voluptas delectus at. Odio non facilis quos aut sunt eos praesentium. Aliquam ut ipsa quis. Laboriosam nobis incidunt corrupti perspiciatis perspiciatis ullam. Repudiandae nobis tenetur aliquam sunt dolores.
Nihil a maiores dolore nisi et ad. Pariatur et reprehenderit et expedita ea enim. Dicta dolores et placeat architecto corrupti voluptatem.
Veniam et ut iusto dolores reiciendis et natus quas. Earum excepturi recusandae inventore nihil. Officia ut vel aut accusamus non. Laboriosam dolorem tenetur non rerum quia aliquid. Aut quas tenetur aut tempora iste doloribus possimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...