Creditor vs Debitor Restructuring
Hello,
I'm going into restructuring working for a group for my SA that does a good mix of distressed M&A, debtor, and creditor bankruptcy mandates. I just wanted to ask - why is it that many on this forum like the debtor side more than the creditor?
I'm looking to go into distressed credit HF investing after my stint. From what I know, the creditor mandates are much more similar to the work a hedge fund does, and debtor is much more from a PE shop perspective in terms of buyside opps. Can someone gives me the pros/cons?
Also: Stupid question but I'm still wrapping my head around it, what are UCC mandates and why does everyone hate them? It seems to me its just creditor side deals focused on unsecured debt tranches, but I was hoping for some more perspective.
I'm familiar with the academic answers, but was hoping to learn more for folks working in the field.
Thanks!
This has been covered at length elsewhere
Company side:
You have to solve the problem here
You’ll run 100 scenarios and write 100+ page options paper on all possible alternatives and will probably run multiple parallel streams to get the company out of whatever bind they’re in (e.g. new money raise, sell assets, D4E swap etc.)
Creditor side:
You’re in receiving mode. You don’t usually drive much, you receive the proposal from company side advisors and you can basically say
(i) yes, but subject to tweaks or
(ii) no and become hostile eg use your exposure to buy the company out which is very interesting but has low chances of success and only if aggressive hedge funds have bought into the debt
UCC
You’re most likely fucked and will be fully equitised. If there’s anyone ahead (e.g. second lien) who is impaired and you don’t like the proposal put forward, you will get crammed down. So role as advisor is quite limited as it’s not like there are a ton of alternatives
Thanks for the MS - please read the post “if there is anyone ahead who is impaired e.g. 2nd lien, you will get crammed down”. The point is that the unsecured may not be the fulcrum