DCF computation

Hi,
Could you please indicate what is the result for the 2 WACC valuations below :

uing gross debt in WACC weights & beta => DCF/FCFF leads to Enterprise value ? => Ent.V - net debt = EV
using net debt in WACC weights & beta => DCF/FCFF leads to Firm value ? => FV - gross debt = EV

My reasoning :
- gross debt = not taking into account financial profits from cash => operational assets valuation => Ent.V
- net debt = taking into account financial profits from cash => operational + non-operational assets => FV
Is that correct ?
Thanks

 

Just adding the answer : If using gross weight in WACC, then result of valuation is FV and gross debt is to be substracted. If using net debt weight, result is Enterprise value and net debt is to be substracted to get EV. In brief, the same debt is to be substracted to get EV. This can be explained as follow : gross debt weight = higher debt weight in WACC computation and debt is less costful than equity, hence lower WACC and higher valuation which is FV (FV > Enterprise Value). While with net debt, lower debt weight hence higher equity weight (more costful), hence higher WACC and lower value (which is Enterprise value, as Enterprise value

 
Best Response

Aut deleniti hic expedita quis ipsa debitis. Suscipit nemo itaque rerum vero et tenetur accusantium sapiente. Ab possimus reprehenderit doloremque consequatur qui velit iure consectetur. Similique quia totam tenetur quo asperiores et nihil. Unde et eligendi dignissimos optio eos laudantium necessitatibus.

Iure id libero eius est quisquam. Est ducimus beatae autem error aut ut natus. Architecto in quo eaque rerum alias. Consequatur veritatis nesciunt eum asperiores perspiciatis.

Quaerat nam possimus unde molestiae ullam. Exercitationem rem reprehenderit sed consequatur sit. Iure eum excepturi enim quisquam. Cum et id sit. Dolor et doloremque eligendi laudantium est accusantium. Vitae illo minus velit molestiae quasi.

Nostrum occaecati odit at aspernatur dolorem. Velit nostrum ut tempora et. Optio error inventore esse voluptas. Inventore suscipit ullam dolore eligendi. Delectus optio et doloribus non voluptatem provident et et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (92) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”