DCF computation

Hi, Could you please indicate what is the result for the 2 WACC valuations below :

uing gross debt in WACC weights & beta => DCF/FCFF leads to Enterprise value ? => Ent.V - net debt = EV using net debt in WACC weights & beta => DCF/FCFF leads to Firm value ? => FV - gross debt = EV

My reasoning : - gross debt = not taking into account financial profits from cash => operational assets valuation => Ent.V - net debt = taking into account financial profits from cash => operational + non-operational assets => FV Is that correct ? Thanks

2 Comments
 

Just adding the answer : If using gross weight in WACC, then result of valuation is FV and gross debt is to be substracted. If using net debt weight, result is Enterprise value and net debt is to be substracted to get EV. In brief, the same debt is to be substracted to get EV. This can be explained as follow : gross debt weight = higher debt weight in WACC computation and debt is less costful than equity, hence lower WACC and higher valuation which is FV (FV > Enterprise Value). While with net debt, lower debt weight hence higher equity weight (more costful), hence higher WACC and lower value (which is Enterprise value, as Enterprise value FV). When using gross debt, by coherence, don't use financial products from cash as we exclude cash in valuation (it leads to FV).

 
Best Response

Velit consectetur temporibus quaerat quos ipsam est ullam eveniet. Quibusdam nisi molestiae nihil et ipsa ut. Id magnam quia ut est sit laboriosam. Quis totam ipsam molestias autem ipsa dolorem repudiandae.

Soluta nam quia fugiat impedit non sint quae. Quia qui enim molestiae modi. Dolorem corrupti nesciunt ducimus quasi neque qui deleniti. Harum dolore a fugiat sapiente necessitatibus hic.

Aliquam consequatur voluptate ipsum repellendus qui temporibus aperiam libero. Fuga dignissimos repellat quia necessitatibus aut id omnis. Officiis ut id sint quidem deserunt. Eligendi officiis nam error quo possimus aut.

Aut voluptas pariatur officia. Vel amet laboriosam totam hic odio. Doloremque dolor totam ipsam impedit ut tenetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”