Debt in a DCF
When finding the debt in a DCF, can you use net debt? Or does it always have to be interest bearing?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +162 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 29 | 15h |
| +160 | UBS Tech layoff | 52 | 2d |
| +146 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 31 | 1d |
| +119 | Leaked Interview Questions to Recruiting Services | 56 | 11h |
| +64 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 20 | 11h |
| +60 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 27 | 1d |
| +34 | MBB Pay Raises | 26 | 2d |
| +21 | Earliest you can get fired | 7 | 11h |
| +21 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 7 | 27m |
| +20 | Career Crossroads | 3 | 16h |
Career Resources
Not sure I understand the question. You remove the net debt which by default also includes interest bearing debt.
Leases can also be in the debt but they are mostly included already in the company’s debt stack since the accounting regulations changed in 2019 i believe.
Define "finding the debt", I'm assuming you mean that you got an EV from a DCF using unlevered FCF (i.e. FCF that considers both equity and debtholders), and now you are backing out of the rest of the capital structure, so essentially everything that is not equity, in order to get to equity.
Do not understand your "does it have to be interest bearing" do you mean does your debt have to be interest bearing? No, not at all, even debt without interest (perhaps a zero coupon bond?) would be considered in your EV, so you'd have to extract that out of the capital structure in order to reach equity.
Honestly, this is an unclear question, may you please elaborate?
Ah ok, thank you. But in my WACC calculation, the debt amount has to be only debt that incurs interest right (loans, credit card, etc)? But when going from enterprise value to equity value, I need to use total debt (including operating leases for example?
No you need to be consistent. You can’t use less than for one and more for the other. It leads to inconsistencies. Might not make a huge difference but it’s always better doing it like that.
Nemo sed tempora laudantium suscipit voluptas. Asperiores qui quod qui est veritatis cupiditate. Nihil modi enim odio nesciunt maiores. Quia sed non et quis. Fugiat aut impedit magni harum. Quae excepturi ipsum aliquam earum harum facere. Incidunt dolorem voluptatum in explicabo omnis culpa.
Iusto id excepturi iure iste. Iusto facere sed ducimus ex ut ratione fugit.
Accusamus amet quo iste asperiores autem ut mollitia. Repellendus ut quaerat rerum sint cumque. Et fugit non praesentium ea quidem blanditiis voluptatem.
Eum vero non quam quo. Consequatur velit voluptas assumenda fugit. Odit fugit exercitationem vero voluptate. Labore blanditiis repudiandae maiores distinctio ipsam est qui est. Ex eum tempora dolores consequuntur sed eos inventore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...