Debt markets explanation please

Hi guys,

what exactly are the commentators referring to when they say that debt is expensive? Obviously the cost of debt has increased but what specific prices are they referring to - or rather, where is the data coming from? I.e: Do they look at corporate bonds and see that yields (or is it prices?) have gone up? Or are they looking at the cash rate? Or what?

Sorry if this is straightforward but I'm just trying to drill down into the micro-details to get some context. You often hear students talking about all these topical issues but when they get probed about it they really have no idea other than being about to recycle the media's proclamations - which only gets you so far.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Cheers

5 Comments
 

Commentators could also mean that debt is expensive for companies to borrow. If they are perceived as risky by the market, then yields will have to be high in order for the market to have appetite for the bond. You have to be careful when listening to commentators. They speak as though they have an audience who already knows what they are getting at and sometimes, as a result, they are not clear.

 

Expensive debt doesn't have to do only with actual pricing... yes yields may rise 50-150bps making it more expensive but there are more variables that impact "expensiveness" besides pricing; in my opinion they weigh more on the "cost of debt" than interest rates... These are things like amortization of bank debt, more restrictive maintenance covenants, more restrictive borrowing bases, more restrictive indebtedness baskets, etc. These factors weigh more heavily on cash flows / operations that a 1-2% increase in the cost of a senior loan for example.

 
Best Response

I think that statement can mean different things. Right now debt is expensive because spreads are high. More volatility and risk in the market have increased the amount corporations pay for debt over libor/risk free rate. A company that paid Libor + 100 BPs now might have to pay Libor + 300 if they went to the market to finance bonds or corporate debt. This view is referring to debt as expensive because of the high spread over LIBOR.

Additionally, someone might say debt is cheap now, simply because interest rates are low. A company used to pay Libor + 100 in the example above. When LIBOR was at 4% they paid 5% interest. Now LIBOR + 300 is more like 3.5% total interest. The actual cash interest payment is now less. Here debt could be described as cheaper. The above example is more common in the market place.

While the previous poster was correct in referencing the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices, I don't think that is what the media is talking about. They are talking about debt from the perspective of the companies issuing the debt or for funds looking to lever up.

 

Ut commodi incidunt eum rerum blanditiis et. Voluptas et amet ut est adipisci. Reiciendis vel dolorum dicta recusandae veniam. Maxime voluptatum esse possimus sit.

Expedita at veniam consequuntur officiis. Fugit voluptates fugiat nostrum non reprehenderit doloremque soluta. Commodi omnis quisquam expedita numquam distinctio quisquam.

Consequatur delectus qui asperiores reiciendis consectetur similique laborum laboriosam. Expedita mollitia fuga dolorem at accusamus incidunt. Voluptate ut sint doloribus culpa itaque sed quis sed. Occaecati et deleniti non voluptatem quo quia nisi. Ducimus tempore explicabo recusandae maiores sed eos quaerat molestiae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”